Talk:Cyberstalking legislation

Untitled

A very interesting article. I wish I was better informed to help make suggestions for improvement. There are only two things I can possibly think to suggest for improving your page.First I would consider including a section on how international law concerning cyberbullying or stalking would be enforced. Also you might want to include a section discussing how an offender would be charged if they do not reside within the same state as their victim (interstate cyberbullying).

WikiThatDrew (talk) 19:55, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

Peer Review from CMTucker

I think this was a good article and very insightful. I would suggest maybe fleshing the introduction out a bit as it seems to be thin on what the topic is and what good stuff lies below the jump.CMTucker (talk) 14:25, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

Peer Review from Tstaudt

Overall I thought this was a pretty good article. At times I thought the language was a little too colloquial, especially for an encyclopedia article. The organization of the article was good, and unbiased. A list of minor edits/ suggestions: I thought that the opening could have had one sentence in summary of what the actual act was- it would make the opening line just a little longer as well. -- Parody can be linked to the Wikipedia article -- you had an inconsistent use of the hyphens for cyber-bullying and cyber-stalking. -- use of clishe with 'different side of the same coin'-- US v Baker is not cited -- Massachusetts law not cited -- 'cibercrime' is misspelled under int'l law I thought it was good, and provided some nice information Tstaudt (talk) 02:04, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

Peer review from Shan Yang

Peer Review: This is a well-organized entry on theme of cyberstalking legislation. At first glimpse, the content is displayed under clear structure, which helps reader to develop first impression of the topic. In the main body, the introduction well defined the concept of cyberbullying and cyberstalking. The article also addressed the legislation situation in US by citing two specific cases in the related field. These information are very helpful clues for readers who may intend to do further research on the topic. However, there still are places that can be enhanced. First I think some essential aspects of the topics are missing in the entry. For example, the author can add a subtitle to illustrate the common forms and types of cyberbullying and cyberstalking, or what kinds of groups of people are most vulnerable. Moreover, it may be better for readers to understand the ambivalence between freedom of speech and cyberbullying by providing more information about the First Amendment. Even a “see also” link will help. Last but not least, this is a well written article and interesting topic. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Suisse514 (talk • contribs) 03:38, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

Peer review from Qi,Qiao

This is a great topic and I think you have organized it in a very meaningful way, from legislation within U.S. to international law. I also like the examples you provide in the article which help a lot to connect with our real life. Here are some of my personal suggestions about this article:

Firstly, I would love to know the forms and types of cyberstalking before getting into legislation. So it makes more sense to me how the legislation has improved the cyberstalking situation. Moreover, I thought the title “legislation by country”is kind of too broad and it seemed that there were no other countries discussed except USA. I would suggest changing the title to “Legislation within USA”. Lastly, you mainly focused on freedom of speech issue. However, I think cyberstalking is not only about speech but also about behavior, which may be further related to privacy and security issue. Probably it’s better to include these issues as well. Realqiao (talk) qiaoqi 14:31, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

Idea for improvement of the article

From my point of view, it seems like we should include statute numbers on the U.S. legislation at least, since they are available online. That seems to be the standard in other articles about legislation, and it would help anyone who is attempting to do a search on what qualifies as cyberstalking. DriftingLeaf (talk) 20:19, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

International section

The of this article is poorly framed, specificaly it is unclear how the international declaration of human rights fits into the argument. CombatWombat42 (talk) 18:06, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

there are some countries note mentioned that should

 for example Canada has strict laws including a national anti harassment laws which can be reported to any school or internet service provider if it has a bad tone to the enviroment
 even look up public safety . gc . ca and other canadian government sites in fact it is ilegel to publish a photograpth of some else without there permission especially in a satire or otherwise degrading way 
  also coming up is anti terror laws

Postmahomeson (talk) 15:44, 18 March 2015 (UTC) feel free to express your assessment to tell me what you think is a good coridenation plan espcially despite of the death of ammanda todd which ammanda todd was sexually stalked until she committed sucide and it got all over the news which is one of the reasons the other is a case in before 2010 with the surgeon and his ex wife in windsor

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Cyberstalking legislation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110717000924/http://www.moga.mo.gov:80/statutes/c500-599/5650000090.htm to http://www.moga.mo.gov/statutes/c500-599/5650000090.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 08:31, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Cyberstalking legislation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160319052033/http://ssl.csg.org/dockets/2012cycle/32B/32Bdocmins/Cyberstalking%2C%20Cyberharassment%20and%20Cyberbullying%20Laws.pdf to http://ssl.csg.org/dockets/2012cycle/32B/32Bdocmins/Cyberstalking%2C%20Cyberharassment%20and%20Cyberbullying%20Laws.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120303112054/http://www.talkfrontier.com/2009/06/30/hate-cyber-bullying-bills-could-threaten-talk-radio/ to http://www.talkfrontier.com/2009/06/30/hate-cyber-bullying-bills-could-threaten-talk-radio/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120620182226/http://www.cyberlawdb.com/main/ to http://www.cyberlawdb.com/main/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110725214031/http://meganmeierfoundation.cwsit.org/Bullying_and_Cyberbullying_Laws_20100701.pdf to http://meganmeierfoundation.cwsit.org/Bullying_and_Cyberbullying_Laws_20100701.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:33, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia Ambassador Program course assignment

This article is the subject of an educational assignment at Michigan State University supported by WikiProject United States Public Policy and the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2011 Spring term. Further details are available on the course page.

The above message was substituted from {{WAP assignment}} by PrimeBOT (talk) on 16:40, 2 January 2023 (UTC)