Talk:CyberLink

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Promotional article edit

This article would need a major overhaul to make Encyclopedic.

I notice that the speedy delete tag was once again removed. Maybe if the person who keeps on removing it would like to explain his side we may be able to compromise on it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rocketrod1960 (talkcontribs)

I agree. This article seems fishy, considerable content seems to be added by the company. Is this article an attempt to make it seem more legitimate? Ottawakismet (talk) 00:29, 10 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Previously speedily deleted as part of a promotional campaign spamming articles into Wikipeda. Restored as a "Notable company"[1]. No notability is apparent in the article, and my search only turns up passing mentions of the company's name in sources talking about products made by the company. WP:NOTINHERITED: not every manufacturer of a notable product is itself notable. If no notability is added to this article in a reasonable time then it should go to AFD. Alsee (talk) 02:49, 30 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on CyberLink. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:55, 15 August 2017 (UTC)Reply