Talk:Customer proprietary network information

Business Low‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Marketing & Advertising Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Marketing & Advertising, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Marketing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Marketing & AdvertisingWikipedia:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingTemplate:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingMarketing & Advertising articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Telecommunications Low‑importance

	Telecommunication portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Telecommunications, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Telecommunications on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TelecommunicationsWikipedia:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTemplate:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTelecommunications articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Government Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Low-importance).

Added the paragraph, people! edit

Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I just added the paragraph about the need to ask consent to access CPNI information. I am currently receiving training about this. Apparently this is the law in the United States.--Achim 00:57, 18 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Telemarketing information inaccurate edit

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The restrictions apply to 3rd parties, joint venture partnerships, or independent contractors

Directory information (name, address, phone number), public information, or mass marketing is not considered a use of CPNI.

An 'in kind' (allowable) use of CPNI could be a long distance company that markets a special rate to their customers who have a history of calling Mexico. A restricted use of CPNI would be 'sharing' those names to another division or company who would try to sell them vacation packages to Mexico.

Of course, with an opt in from the customer on record, the second example would be legitimate.

Don't confuse the obligations imposed by the Do Not Call list with the CPNI regulations--even though there are similarities between the allowed exemptions for existing relationships. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Khaliban (talk • contribs) 17:59, 27 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Too much personal interpretation: edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The middle section of the "description", which attempts to explain application of FCC rules, is written as a personal interpretation of the these rules rather than cited, fact-based information. The grammar is poor, and the entire second half of the paragraph is one long run-on sentence. I suggest this section be completely eliminated from this article and replaced with a more factual description of related laws and FCC regs (sans opinion or personal interpretation). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.29.109.142 (talk) 00:45, 21 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Add topic