What is wrong with the lead? edit

It's not like this town is overly large or overly notable. The most important thing that ever happened here, apparently, was the mid-19th century founding of the company that is the predecessor to Berkshire Hathaway, Valley Falls Co. I find the comment on the opening paragraph to be misguided and maybe even downright silly. Simplton (talk) 22:31, 18 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

The lead is a bit sparse compared to the lead of some wiki articles about other similar Rhode Island towns, Lincoln, for example. I agree that Cumberland is not especially notable, at least as compared to other more interesting places like Newport, Providence or even Pawtucket but that does not mean the article cannot be written in an interesting manner. Obviously, anyone who comes to read the article is interested in learning about the town and this article leaves out a lot of interesting facts about the town. I would lead the article with "was home to the first European settler of what eventually became Rhode Island" In other words, Cumberland is to Rhode Island what Plymouth is to Massachusetts or St. Augustine is to Florida. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.14.134.196 (talk) 11:08, 17 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Cumberland, Rhode Island. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:49, 3 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 10:36, 7 July 2022 (UTC)Reply