Talk:Cryoneurolysis
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | This article was the subject of an educational assignment in 2013 Q3. Further details were available on the "Education Program:Georgia Institute of Technology/Introduction to Neuroscience (Fall 2013)" page, which is now unavailable on the wiki. |
-- --
1. Quality of Information: 1
- Some sections may need to added to, as they are lacking in detail, but information appears up-to-date and helpful to the reader. Adding details to the shorter sections may aid in strengthening the article
2. Article size: 1
- Only 10,609 bytes--Did not reach the 15,000 byte minimum
3. Readability: 2
- Very readable and easy to understand for the common reader, may link provided to aid the reader in background research
4. Refs: 2
- More than 10 citations used with some being recent publications
5. Links: 2
- Very well linked and provides much opportunity to develop the wiki world with suggested wikipedia pages in red
6. Responsive to comments: 2
- No comments made so no action needed to be taken
7. Formatting: 2
- Formatted well, minor errors in Capitalization, but those are easily fixed
8. Writing: 2
9. Used real name or has real name on User TALK page:2
10. Outstanding?: 1
- The extra media added are helpful, but as mentioned above, some areas are lacking in body and detail. Adding some additional information to those sections (like the "Treatment of Disorders" section) will make this article more outstanding
_______________
Total: 17 out of 20
Mmcmullen3 (talk) 05:22, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
1. Quality of Information: 1
Latter sections do not have sufficient information. It would be better to combine a few sections rather than have two sentences with its own header
2. Article size:1
Did not reach minimum requirement
3. Readability:2
4. Refs:2
5. Links:2
6. Responsive to comments:2
7. Formatting:1
Subsections are too small. I would also consider renaming some of the sections to be more clear.
8. Writing:2
9. Used real name or has real name on User TALK page:2
10. Outstanding?:1
Needs more content.
_______________
Total: 16 out of 20
Mac Merritt (talk) 09:45, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
1. Quality of Information: 1, could have more content in some sections (eg. briefly describe the 5 categories of nerve injury instead of just linking them)
2. Article size: 1, Doesn't meet 15k requirement.
3. Readability: 2
4. Refs: 2
5. Links: 2
6. Responsive to comments: 2
7. Formatting: 1. Better organization, the history section could be put at the top as part of introduction to the article.
8. Writing: 2
9. Used real name or has real name on User TALK page: 2
10. Outstanding?: 1. More content in sections. _______________ Total: 16 out of 20
Laura McKenzie (talk) 16:30, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for your feedback. I have taken your comments into consideration and tried to improve the article based on them. Morgan Merritt (talk) 01:46, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
Jpreciado affiliated with myoscience, Inc. Redwood City, CA, USA. Jpreciado (talk) 18:35, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
Truncated sentence edit
The last sentence of the Intro paragraph needs to be finished. It reads "Cryoneurolysis has been used to treat a variety of painful conditions including." Including what? Mystic22222 (talk) 18:45, 15 July 2017 (UTC)