Talk:Crusaders of Might and Magic
Untitled edit
That was annoying. Had to redo the Diablo disambig bit 12 times because wikipedia was playing up. Oh well. Just felt like saying that somewhere. 203.122.218.47 17:03, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
NPOV edit
Sikon's tagged this as lacking neutrality; is this because it takes a qualitative stance on the subject matter? ERobson 22:59, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
- Yes, it's full of statements such as "It was part of a deliberate effort by 3DO to cash in on successful franchises with hastily-developed spin-offs." and "The voice acting is terrible, even by the low standards of video game voice acting." These sentences are in no way factual or encyclopedic, let alone neutral. - Sikon 07:26, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
- I tried to work on it a bit. What do you think about this new version? — Shir Khan (?-"-!) — 23:27, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
- It needs citations for those claims about being a flop and widely regarded as sub-par. MacMoney 10:51, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
- I attempted to copy edit the entire article, and hopefully got rid of a bit of the bias. I haven't yet put citations in for the "flop" etc. Maybe I can find something to support it. I also edited the system requirements and put the actual technical ones in. Elsbeth0 00:06, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
- The plot section needs a complete reworking - Talking about linear story & lack of sub-quests and even worse, talking about jokes is completely out of the Plot section (It's out of the article too) - Wikipedia is not to submitting REVIEWS (Use MobyGames or GameFAQs) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.24.20.180 (talk) 09:51, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
- I attempted to copy edit the entire article, and hopefully got rid of a bit of the bias. I haven't yet put citations in for the "flop" etc. Maybe I can find something to support it. I also edited the system requirements and put the actual technical ones in. Elsbeth0 00:06, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
- It needs citations for those claims about being a flop and widely regarded as sub-par. MacMoney 10:51, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
- I tried to work on it a bit. What do you think about this new version? — Shir Khan (?-"-!) — 23:27, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
Incorrect info edit
I'd like to address the misleading/false part on this page, claiming that you can cast magic spells without using mana. You do certainly need mana for every spell. I don't want to alter the sentence though, as taking that claim out would leave the page with an inclomplete and empty sentence. Anyone care to make something out of this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paddotk (talk • contribs) 21:16, 2 March 2014 (UTC)