Talk:Crimean Mountain karst

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Crimean Mountain karst article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Ukraine Low‑importance

	Ukraine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ukraine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ukraine on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.UkraineWikipedia:WikiProject UkraineTemplate:WikiProject UkraineUkraine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Crimea Task Force.

Protected areas Low‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Protected areas, a WikiProject related to national parks and other protected natural or ecological areas worldwide.Protected areasWikipedia:WikiProject Protected areasTemplate:WikiProject Protected areasProtected areas articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Environment Low‑importance

	Environment portal This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from Crimean Mountain karst appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 4 March 2023 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the Crimean Mountain karst nature reserve in Ukraine has more than 1,000 natural karst cavities?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2023/March. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Crimean Mountain karst.

Wikipedia

Did you know nomination edit

Latest comment: 1 year ago5 comments3 people in discussion

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Dying (talk) 09:39, 20 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that the Crimean Mountain karst nature reserve in Ukraine has more than 1000 natural karst cavities? Source: reserve of national importance (since 1989) and The area has more than 1000 natural karst cavities.
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Caulfield railway station

Created by Mupper-san (talk) and Bruxton (talk). Nominated by Bruxton (talk) at 17:35, 13 February 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Crimean Mountain karst; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.Reply

General eligibility:
New enough:
Long enough:
Other problems:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: @Mupper-san and Bruxton:, The article is new [February 13, 2023], long enough [2122 characters (315 words) ], and hook is interested too. The second paragraph of the description contains important numerical information, and I have tagged it as needing an inline citation. RV (talk) 03:20, 14 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

@RAJIVVASUDEV: Thanks so much for the review. I moved the Gunn reference back to that section. It is correct now. Bruxton (talk) 14:40, 14 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

@Bruxton and Mupper-san: All right,

good to go. Thanks RV (talk) 05:46, 15 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Feedback from New Page Review process edit

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Thanks for the article. I did a bit of editing adding additional technical information and I added to the lead. I also nominated the article for DYK. good work!

Bruxton (talk) 17:45, 13 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Add topic