 | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
DNA Project
editI have reverted the deletion of this Section made by Agricolae on 19 May 2017. He/she quote OR as the grounds. I have now added a reference quoting published research by FTDNA. Mike Spathaky (talk) 15:41, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
- It is still Original research - you don't get to look at raw data and conclude what you think is interesting and what you think is surprising or what you think is noteworthy, for which we use published secondary sources. This is raw scientific data, self reported and unvetted and the text is the personal opinions and interpretations of the author, which FTDNA has not edited to verified. Further, I am concerned you are using Wikipedia to publicizze your own research. Agricolae (talk) 17:02, 21 May 2017 (UTC)