Talk:Coverity

Cpplint

This is personal experience, so I'm not prepared to change the original article, but I don't think ccplint should be mentioned as a competitor to Coverity. We've just performed a two day evaluation with Coverity, and ccplint has an entirely different function and purpose.

Also, it's refershing to know Google advocates One True Brace! --Woolhiser (talk) 20:01, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

Links

Links [3] and [4] are broken — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.97.87.228 (talk) 17:52, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

LibreOffice

Should be cited => LibreOffice Makes Strides in Software Quality with Coverity Scan --Kizar (talk) 11:07, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Coverity. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081010164925/http://www.infoworld.com/article/08/06/30/Coverity-buys-Solidware-to-boost-code-analysis_1.html to http://infoworld.com/article/08/06/30/Coverity-buys-Solidware-to-boost-code-analysis_1.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.zdnetasia.com/news/security/0%2C39044215%2C39315781%2C00.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130526101953/http://www.softwaremag.com/content/ContentCT.asp?P=3169 to http://www.softwaremag.com/content/ContentCT.asp?P=3169

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:46, 13 August 2017 (UTC)