Talk:Covered business method patent
Latest comment: 8 years ago by PraeceptorIP in topic Whether to merge with "Business method"
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | This article follows the Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Legal. It uses the Bluebook legal referencing style. This citation style uses standardized abbreviations, such as "N.Y. Times" for The New York Times, and has specific typeface formatting requirements. Please review those standards before making style or formatting changes. Information on this referencing style may be obtained at: Cornell's Basic Legal Citation site. |
Whether to merge with "Business method" edit
I don't think merging makes sense. The BM article is largely about policy and what social impact business method patents have. This CBM article is about a special (technical) legal procedure in the USPTO, created in the AIA (a US statute) to test the validity of BM patents more cheaply than in district court. The target audiences of BM page and CBM page are different, as are their respective interests. In addition, the CBM article is strictly US while the BM article covers many different countries, not just US. PraeceptorIP (talk) 01:09, 22 July 2015 (UTC)