Talk:Corey Robin
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | It is requested that an image or photograph be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
Wikipedians in New York City may be able to help! The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
.svg){kind=small} | Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
New York Review of Books resource edit
Republicans for Revolution January 12, 2012 by Mark Lilla regarding The Reactionary Mind: Conservatism from Edmund Burke to Sarah Palin (Oxford University Press) 99.181.147.68 (talk) 03:07, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
Notable? edit
I'm a professor exploring the boundaries of Wikipedia's notability requirements. Granted that Corey Robin is a decent academic professional and has written books, what makes him notable? Is it just because hee writes on a topic that many would deem relevant (politics), rather than, say, German Literature? Why is there a Wikipedia page for him and not, for example, David Bradshaw (U. Kentucky)? Theguide42 (talk) 12:15, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
- Absolutely. He also quotes himself . 2A02:C7C:AAA4:9600:E900:BF45:3BEB:E10D (talk) 23:53, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
I'min agreement. He seems to self aggrandize and sets himself up as a authority on Conservatism Whitebear1967 (talk) 17:30, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
- Negative explaining ("If there isn't A, then there shouldn't be B") is not very academic, because academic is about expanding the knowledge, not diminishing it. So to answer the question: some articles don't exist, because they haven't been written, or have been written but dont fulfill the required standards for WP. Since WP has no editorial, that assigns articles to writers, this happens especially when the topics are less popular or don't have a solid base of interested people. This seems to me rather logical, which either means the required standards for being a professor are very low or you ain't a professor. (See "reversal of the burden of proof", which is the same principle.] 95.91.64.232 (talk) 12:48, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
Not notable edit
he isn't of note and quotes himself in edits 2A02:C7C:AAA4:9600:E900:BF45:3BEB:E10D (talk) 23:52, 19 January 2024 (UTC)