Talk:Cooper, Texas/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: TenPoundHammer (talk · contribs) 17:46, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   No issues with prose.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   Everything that needs a source is properly sourced.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Every aspect is covered. I used to have a cousin who lived in Cooper, so a lot of the reading here was fascinating.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   I added a shot of some businesses on the town square, as I felt the article needed an image on the town itself.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Great job on the article.