Talk:Convention Relating to the Status of Stateless Persons

Human rights High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

International relations: United Nations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject United Nations (assessed as Mid-importance).

Law Mid‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Correct listing of parties to the Convention edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

On 3 October, I saw that only 63 parties were named as parties to the Convention. I therefore replaced that list with the list on the Treaty Collection page, which claims that there are 83 parties, but lists 88 (including the Holy See). I have NOT: (1) examined the Treaty Collection list to distinguish between types of parties; (2) updated the 'categories' at the bottom of the page; or (3) updated the map of parties at the top of the page. I welcome correction if I have made any errors: I do not know about the treaty, and have just performed a technical edit. Colin Rowat (talk) 20:48, 3 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Move edit

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Sorry, goofed in the reason: I meant MOS:TITLECAPS not WP:TITLECAPS. Knr5 (talk) 20:04, 3 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Add topic