Talk:Constantine's Sword (film)

neutrality

The article describes the movie like it would be uncovering undisputable facts, which hardly reflects the reality... Irwing (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 14:12, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Compromised neutrality?

Could the editors explain which parts are non-factual?

The article merely deals with what the film asserts. Do the editors contest that the Catholic Church has demonstrated animus towards Jews or Muslims? This animus is demonstrated by the historical record. As to animus toward Muslims, see Benedict's recent comments on Islam. Dogru144 (talk) 07:00, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

• I have removed the POV flag. If there were sentences in this article that expressed a POV, they are no longer present. —Aetheling (talk) 00:57, 13 April 2009 (UTC).

Advertisement?

How can someone claim that it reads like an advertisement? It is written in neutral, factual language. Where are the tags on similar wiki articles that give mere synopses? The references provided are film reviews.Dogru144 (talk) 18:47, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

a compelling personal narrative — a kind of detective story — as one man uncovers the dark areas of his own past, searching for a better future = advertising language.

Actually I think it's worse, I think this may be a copyright violation, it appears to be text copied directly from somewhere else. --George100 (talk) 21:50, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

I appreciate it's many years later but that it "appears" to be copied from somewhere else is a farcical reason to try and imply it's "worse" than an advert, at least some minimal effort could have been made to justify this assertion.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.34.161.198 (talk) 01:17, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Constantine's Sword (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080420071803/http://www.hollywoodjesus.com/movieDetail.cfm/i/61D3FDB1-C43A-34AD-1D9440BEF01F9779 to http://www.hollywoodjesus.com/movieDetail.cfm/i/61D3FDB1-C43A-34AD-1D9440BEF01F9779

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:29, 12 August 2017 (UTC)