 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
NPOV edit
@Malik Shabazz: you reverted my edit with the edit summary:
| “ | Not a single opinion expressed -- those are all facts, even if there is no source cited | ” |
- With all due respect, did you read what you just wrote? I like P-Funk as much as the next person, but a source is needed for something like that (this isn't a WP:BLUE situation, now). Erpert blah, blah, blah... 01:36, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
- With all due respect, do you know what WP:NPOV means? — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 01:38, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
- Yes, and that section appeared non-neutral due to the absence of sources; I mean, who says those are facts? Erpert blah, blah, blah... 01:45, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
- With all due respect, do you know what WP:NPOV means? — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 01:38, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
- You can't be as stupid as you're acting. What opinions were expressed? You may think the facts are wrong, but there are no opinions expressed. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 02:01, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
- Hey, chill out with the personal attacks. Erpert blah, blah, blah... 06:54, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
- You can't be as stupid as you're acting. What opinions were expressed? You may think the facts are wrong, but there are no opinions expressed. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 02:01, 11 April 2019 (UTC)