Talk:Congregation Emanu-El (San Francisco)
 | This article was nominated for deletion on September 13, 2006. The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright problem removed edit
One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). The material was copied from: http://texts.cdlib.org:8088/xtf/data/13030/ht/kt9f59q7ht/kt9f59q7ht.xml. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Moonriddengirl (talk) 18:59, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
Another copyright violation edit
Earlier today, I reverted a significant expansion of this article, because I was almost certain that it was a copyright violation. In addition, the material was unreferenced, and had a promotional tone, written in the first person. It was not written from the neutral point of view. I did not have time to investigate further. I have now verified that this material was cut and pasted from the Congregation Emanu-El website. Although I assume that the IP editor who did so was acting in good faith, this is simply not acceptable in a Wikipedia article, and I stand by my decision to revert. I am willing to work with any editor who wants to expand this article, as long as it is done in accordance with key Wikipedia policies. Cullen328 (talk) 01:34, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Requested Move edit
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: page moved. Armbrust The Homunculus 02:02, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
Congregation Emanu-El (San Francisco, California) → Congregation Emanu-El (San Francisco) – AP city name guidelines. State name is unnecessary for San Francisco. Article was previously named Congregation Emanu-El (San Francisco) and moved to Congregation Emanu-El (San Francisco, California) in 2008. Goldnpuppy (talk) 22:11, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
- Support State name is not necessary when the city is world famous. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 03:15, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.