This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I do not know Italian, but whoever translated the article from Italian to English apparently believes English word order is the same as Italian word order. In addition, some words seem to be incorrectly translated. Nearly half the sentences have lost their meaning. The article is so useless, it ought to deleted and retranslated by someone who (a) knows both languages and (b) is familiar with the history of Venice, and the other Italian city-state republics. Solo Owl 17:23, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
If you think that it can be improved (which it obviously can) - then WP:FIXIT. The article was mostly synced over from Google Translate a couple years ago when the series still needed more info from the Italian Wikipedia. So yes, it does have some quality and WP:COPYEDIT issues. Shaded0 (talk) 17:45, 28 January 2017 (UTC)Reply
