This article is within the scope of WikiProject Occult, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to the occult on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OccultWikipedia:WikiProject OccultTemplate:WikiProject OccultOccult articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I don't think the article requires a footnote stating that a list of Beaumont's opinions are Beaumont's opinions and not Velikovsky's, as the article nowhere says or implies that they are. But in any case, such a note—if included—should be a report of a reputable source's opinion, not a report of an anonymous editor's personal opinion or analysis. - Nunh-huh 05:54, 11 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I'm one of the few people to have read Beaumont's books. The RD quote suggests be thought Wales was Galilee and Athens was at Bath... I think Beaumont claimed Somerset was Galilee and Dumbarton was Athens.
I'm not endorsing his ideas, but it is worth pointing out RD's mistakes here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.249.184.203 (talk) 11:18, 29 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
.png){kind=small}
