Talk:Computing education
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
 | Text and/or other creative content from this version of Computer science was copied or moved into Computer science education with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 12 January 2022 and 4 May 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): AmanDwivedi11 (article contribs).
Proposal to replace Template:Educational research with the Template:Education edit
The Template:Educational research box should be removed from this article for the reasons discussed here: Template talk:Educational research#Proposal to replace this with the Template:Education. Sda030 (talk) 15:40, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
Adding info from sources edit
Hi, I am planning to edit the article using the following sources:- Happe, L., Buhnova, B., Koziolek, A. et al. Effective measures to foster girls’ interest in secondary computer science education. Educ Inf Technol 26, 2811–2829 (2021)[1] This is a literature review discussing ways to improve the number of women in higher computer science education. Marshall, S., Grooms, A. Industry’s push for computer science education: Is computer science really for all. Sage Journals, Vol. 0(0) 1–22 (2022)[2] This is a research paper discussing how computer science is becoming part of the core curriculum in schools. I would really appreciate some feedback on these sources and/or suggestions to use some other sources.AmanDwivedi11 (talk) 03:29, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
- Hi Aman, good initiative to use research papers for this, and the suggested papers are recent and published in peer-reviewed journals. I like in particular that the Happe et al article is open access. As an educational researcher, I have a few comments:
- As for Marshall and Grooms (2022), note that the paper is specifically about US policy. It is therefore best to place your additions under a heading such as Computer science education in the United States or simply In the United States. At Wikipedia we attempt to make articles as globally useful as possible, and US-centrism is a recurrent challenge. They also seem to be focusing on a particular company, so make sure you do not end up being onesided.
- The Happe et al article focuses on girls. I suggest this could go under the heading Women in computer science. (Though I would prefer to have the heading changed to Gender perspectives in computer science education).
- The style you write the references is a bit off, but I can help with that later. Note that the journal is not Sage Journals, but Policy Futures in Education.
- In case you have limited academic/encyclopedic experience: Remember to cite the original, to paraphrase rather than copy, and be Wikipedia:Be bold! Sda030 (talk) 19:52, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
Power point edit
1...microsoft office word 2...microsoft exel 3...power point — Preceding unsigned comment added by 105.112.123.219 (talk) 10:24, 1 December 2022 (UTC)