Talk:Combat Mission

Advert Language/Syrian Civil War

Some parts of this article read like it's been edited by the developers. The tidbit concerning the Syrian civil war - which reads very much like a 'disclaimer' - is particularly telling. This, in addition to the lack of sources, seems a little un-wikipedian. Thoughts? 2601:87:4400:AF2:1E5:7EA2:8D4E:545B (talk) 00:39, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

Untitled

7/4/05 fixed some spelling and grammer. Chris

7/4/05 fixed some spelling and awkward grammer. also removed a few POV comments --Headquarters

"All games offer to play as a single player versus a customizable AI" - in what way is the AI customizable? Difficulty modifiers change the number of units (or points, in a QB).

13/09/06 One of the greatest computer wargames of all time. The PBEM play is so good that web sites and online clubs for Combat Mission have thrived and IMHO will continue to do so for a long time on the future. This game is the benchmark for all other turn based computer games to be measured against, Star Rating *****. - Ian (Online nickname: Vulture)

• Yep truly a great series. I still play Barbarossa to Berlin and Afrika Corps quite often. I'm a bit disappointed that Battlefront have chosen a fictional conflict for the next instalment though. Lisiate 03:52, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Combat Mission. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150502075531/http://gametheorycast.com/combat-mission-fortress-italy-reviewed/ to http://gametheorycast.com/combat-mission-fortress-italy-reviewed/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080611052541/http://www.chattlehope.org/CMMC3_Tunisia.html to http://www.chattlehope.org/CMMC3_Tunisia.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928061945/http://www.theblitz.org/scenarios/show_scenarios.php?game=64&opart=0&order=sd_rating&h2h=No to http://www.theblitz.org/scenarios/show_scenarios.php?game=64&opart=0&order=sd_rating&h2h=No

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:35, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

Various portions read like an ad.

Certain parts of this article kind of seem like an ad and not actual cited fact. For example,

"Battlefront.com, in an unusual move for the industry, will provide inexpensive upgrades for owners of the original Shock Force game. This is being done to show genuine appreciation of the very strong player community that has built up around CM:SF."

Is this normal, or unnecessary? 2600:8805:5202:7000:E8D5:4580:F922:E3CC (talk) 23:01, 11 June 2023 (UTC)