Talk:Code of conduct

Latest comment: 1 year ago by 2A00:23C5:FE18:2701:98F1:A269:7359:E9CB in topic Untitled

Untitled edit

Merging with "precept" is a very bad idea. Actually there is nothing more to say. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.143.223.92 (talk) 20:10, 22 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

-> agreed code of coduct and precept are two different terms, never coincided in one text. Both have different shades of meaning —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.46.0.234 (talk) 16:40, 23 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Codes of conduct are not always "professional" (they may be encountered, for example, if you are an amateur programmer who contributes to open-source projects); and they aren't always ethical either! Sometimes it's a way to bully people into following political norms, etc. So: that's why. Many people know the term COC but might not have even heard of an "ethical code", let alone encountered one at work. 2A00:23C5:FE18:2701:98F1:A269:7359:E9CB (talk) 02:52, 2 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Proposed merge with Company code of conduct edit

Company code of conduct is unsourced, but it has more information specific to companies, so some of this content could probably be merged. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 16:50, 25 July 2017 (UTC)Reply