Talk:Coat of arms of Sevastopol/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jordano53 (talk · contribs) 02:41, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

I'll take this one. First GA review for me, quite exciting. Jordano53 (talk) 02:41, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

---

Very nice article! A few minor tweaks and I think it should be good to go.

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

• Place link at first instance of Sevastopol City Council in lead
• "From July 21, 1893 until the October Revolution in 1917..." + "...has been struck down by the Legislative Assembly on July 3, 2019 due to the criticisms..."
  A comma needs to be added after the years.
• "...alongside the 2018 Russian presidential election, however was later cancelled due to time constraints."
  A pronoun should go in between "however" and "was".
• As this topic concerns Russia, date formats should be "dd-mm-yyyy".

1. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

   Very well sourced. Passes Earwig's Copyvio Detector.

2. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

3. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

4. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

5. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   Might be beneficial to caption the coat of arms in the "19th century" section. Not very clear what it refers to when reading the article.

6. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

---

Thanks Jordano53 for the review and I am glad you like the article; I have made the necessary changes. Thanks, Toreightyone (talk) 23:02, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

@Toreightyone: Great! I made two slight changes to the article if that is okay with you. Otherwise, this article should be good to go and I have passed it. Jordano53 (talk) 23:25, 17 May 2020 (UTC)