Talk:Clyde F.C. Under-20s and Academy

	Association football portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This redirect is supported by the Scottish football task force.

Scotland Low‑importance

	Scotland portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merge/Tidy suggestion edit

Latest comment: 5 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

This article deserves credit for the detail of the content, but a lot of the pertinent historical stuff could go on the (also very comprehensive) main Clyde page, or is already there. The 'notable players list' is on both articles when it could be removed from one with a link to the other page.

It also seems the page isn't being updated with current squads/results.

Lastly, it's debatable whether Clyde academy deserves its own article? The authors confirm they have not been been in the top tier of the reserve or youth structures for the past 40 years. The equivalent Scottish academy articles are for the largest clubs challenging for the national competitions, which Clyde youths have not really come close to doing. They are certainly important to the club and to the local community, but does that justify a separate article for the junior branch of a semi-professional team with only a few hundred season ticket holders? Crowsus (talk) 17:11, 9 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Belated response, but yes, I think your concerns are valid. An article like this does seem something like overkill. While there is an impressive level of detail, it's very patchily sourced. Jellyman (talk) 10:10, 25 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Merger complete. Klbrain (talk) 08:44, 19 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 13 external links on Clyde F.C. Under-20s and Academy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:54, 9 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic