Former good article nomineeClub Nacional de Football was a Sports and recreation good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 27, 2011Good article nomineeNot listed

Official international honours edit

I think this section should be changed. Even though tournaments such as Copa Rio de la Plata, Copa de Honor Cousenier, etc. are international in nature they are not considered as official by CONMEBOL and thus should be not counted. Bruno18 16:18, 30 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Tickets sold and polls edit

I proceed to delete the sentence "In addition, Nacional is the team that sold most tickets in the history of the game in Uruguay, and it frequently comes on top in polls regarding sporting preferences in Uruguay." cause it does not provide any neutral reference. To provide fansite references in sentences like this is not only inadequate but also improper. Please refer to spanish article to read the discussion topic about this situation. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 190.64.33.104 (talk) 20:02, 17 January 2007 (UTC).Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Escudo ch.jpg edit

 

Image:Escudo ch.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 20:24, 13 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

File:CNdeFlogo.png Nominated for speedy Deletion edit

  An image used in this article, File:CNdeFlogo.png, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?
Speedy deletions at commons tend to take longer than they do on Wikipedia, so there is no rush to respond. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 00:50, 13 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

The article is very outdated! edit

The article is very outdated for the Spanish version! [[1]] --Aguss Robles (talk) 02:32, 13 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Club Nacional de Football. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:52, 26 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 19:07, 1 May 2021 (UTC)Reply