Talk:Cleo Davis

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 24 August 2020 and 4 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Flickjo. Peer reviewers: BaiJoLogan, Garberb.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 19:09, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cleo Davis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111109194541/http://www.nativeground.com/articles/80-cleo-davis-the-original-bluegrass-boy.html to http://nativeground.com/articles/80-cleo-davis-the-original-bluegrass-boy.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:30, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

Peer Review

The introduction is pretty well developed considering the amount of content in the main section. The article is also well divided and I could use it as a good reference to divide mine in a similar way. However, the article definitely needs more references and also more content in the main body. The Rosenberg: Bluegrass History book could further be used for more information.Banjerpicker77 (talk) 17:56, 10 October 2019 (UTC)