This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Private Eyes edit
Currently playing a recurring character (Nolan) on Private Eyes — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.161.165.22 (talk) 11:27, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
To Be Threateningly Elegant, Or Not To Be? edit
Single purpose account Jbond001 says yes, while 38.90.141.20, 69.143.43.176 and Bearcat say no.
I'm torn myself. It's a rather apt description of his first appearance on the show, while the later episodes turn him into little more than a disposable canon fodder that keeps getting killed in fun yet forgettable ways.99.58.57.1 (talk) 20:17, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
- The trouble is that Wikipedia has to be neutral in its point of view. We can say he played a particular character, but we cannot presume to tell the reader how they're supposed to feel about it, by attaching subjective descriptors like "threateningly elegant" to the character. We need to just describe things objectively, not get wrapped up in value judgements. Bearcat (talk) 20:24, 2 November 2015 (UTC)