Talk:City of Caterpillar
 | This article was nominated for deletion on March 15, 2007. The result of the discussion was keep. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Untitled edit
This article should mention something about their breakup (which I know nothing about, unfortunately). It is kind of odd that everything is in the past tense and it isn't mentioned. Recury 18:54, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks. Recury 15:51, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
last.fm edit
i couldn't help noticing that the intro text to this article is entirely copied and pasted from their last.fm page. maybe someone could rephrase(retype) it.--Nirvanarox55 (talk) 17:08, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
Quality edit
This article seems particularly weak. Beyond using no citations, it does very little to substantiate its validity as legitimate wikipedia article. While I agree that this article be kept because of the band's significance, i dont think the article meets quality standards, and does no job whatsoever of justifying this band's importance to the development of its genre, or its impact on bands that followed. It seems to be nothing more than an introduction to a bio page on their website, or a favorable review by pitchfork. --Panzerschreck1 (talk) 14:31, 9 November 2008 (UTC)