This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dinosaurs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of dinosaurs and dinosaur-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DinosaursWikipedia:WikiProject DinosaursTemplate:WikiProject Dinosaursdinosaurs articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Position in Elmisaurinae not found by the paperedit
Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Although it does recover Citipes as the sister taxon of Elmisaurus, the paper describing Citipes does not assign it to Elmisaurinae, but instead to Caenagnathinae. It seems in this paper that Elmisaurinae and Caenagnathinae are defined differently from the usage seen on Wikipedia. So what do we do about this? Zigongosaurus1138 (talk) 09:18, 20 September 2020 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 4 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Article seems very incomplete, as it does not say much concrete about the animal, apart from its classification. 130.233.11.83 (talk) 07:43, 9 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
