Talk:Cindy Aurum

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Cindy Aurum/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Kung Fu Man (talk · contribs) 11:48, 27 March 2024 (UTC)

Reviewer: Pokelego999 (talk · contribs) 03:48, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

Will hit this up soon. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 03:48, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

@Kung Fu Man (talk · contribs)

GA Criteria

1. Article is well-written.

2. No OR, all info is cited in the article.

3. Broad in coverage. Covers multiple aspects of the subject.

4. Article appears neutral, and does not appear to hold a significantly negative nor positive stance on the subject.

5. Article appears stable. No vandalism from what I can tell.

6. Two fair use images, one CC image. The former two have proper usage rationales.

Lead

-Could you define in greater depth what a "Cid" is in the lead, aka what it does/means in the series context?

• Expanded with more info here and in the design info.

Concept and creation

-Section looks good.

Appearances

-Section looks good.

Promotion and reception

-"characters like Cindy represented the rougher edges of a title that went through a troubled development." How so?

• Fixed with a small rewrite, should hopefully be clearer.

-I feel the use of "titillate" may be confusing due to its status as a more niche word. I'd change it, though you can leave it if you feel it best.

• Put quotes around titillate as it's an exact quote, and tried to make clearer.

-Overall looks fine. I've made some touch-ups for minor fixes such as typos and such in places.

Overall

Article looks good overall. Just touch on these points and I'll be happy to pass this article.

• All should be fixed, let me know if there's anything else to tidy!--Kung Fu Man (talk) 00:16, 13 April 2024 (UTC)

Looks good! Happy to pass. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 01:26, 13 April 2024 (UTC)