| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
Untitled] edit
Why has my tidied version been changed back to the original un-tidied version? Wikipedia should use continuous pros, not just information listed seemingly at random. All of the information found in the original list was incorporated into my tidied version, it just looked and flowed better. We do not need info such as where 'Scary Monsters' charted on Chuck Hammer's article, that information should be in the Scary Monsters article. If people want to know they will click the link.
If you contribute to Wikipedia you must understand that your work may be changed and it is not acceptable to revert because you do not want it changed as stated in the Five Pillars of Wikipedia: 'Recognize that articles can be changed by anyone and no individual controls any specific article; therefore, any writing you contribute can be mercilessly edited and redistributed at will by the community'
I have reverted the majority of the article back but have included relevant contributions.
Chillymail 19:15, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
Umm. Wow. edit
Somebody sure does like the word "textural", don't they? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.224.75.67 (talk) 11:44, 8 November 2016 (UTC)