This article was nominated for deletion on January 31 2015. The result of the discussion was delete.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) --92.47.26.198 (talk) 12:06, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
it was fully re-written and all the self-commercvial was removed. The page is 100% re-done and reliable sources only were added.Reply
Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I've marked that claim as dubious, since there only one source which seems to claim it (or at least one which doesn't seem to be in some sort of direct control of the subject of the article), which would seem unusual or such a claim that it wouldn't be more broadly known. The source itself is authored by one person who worked at the same university as the subject was apparently working and is a semi-interview, so it seems likely a primary source and difficult to know what sort of fact checking occured. The author also only has one piece ever published by the outlet, and it is in the "News Feature" section which seems to be an editorial - WP:NEWSORG as part of WP:RS states - "Editorial commentary, analysis and opinion pieces, whether written by the editors of the publication (editorials) or outside authors (op-eds) are reliable primary sources for statements attributed to that editor or author, but are rarely reliable for statements of fact." (emphasis mine). Other facts arributed to this source may therefore also be dubious --86.2.216.5 (talk) 08:11, 1 April 2015 (UTC)Reply
.jpg){kind=small}
