Talk:Christian anarchism/GA1

Latest comment: 13 years ago by ResidentAnthropologist in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: The Resident Anthropologist (talk)•(contribs) 01:51, 23 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Initial Review edit

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:  
    I am spotting run-on sentences all over the place
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:  
    Lead fails to comply with WP:LEAD, Lots of violations of WP:W2W, Multiple WP:EMBED lists that could be better incorporated with prose
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:  
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:  
    Lots of places need third party sources, I have tagged them
    C. No original research:  
    Lots of what appears to be original research third party sourcing could clear up alot of this
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    Overall coverage is erratic and jumps back and forth
    B. Focused:  
    History section fails to cover the history of the ideology. Simply listing supporting elements of CA in history is insufficient
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
    article hinges on Alexandre Christoyannopoulos, could be expanded to include other writers on the issue
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
    You seem to be the only working on it and no serious
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:  
    Looks good
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:  
    At this initial review of material I say it needs alot of work. IF you have questions post below and we can see about fixing the issues before a final review.