Talk:Chris Sarra
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 22 January 2007. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=logo}
August 2015 edits by Treehugger71 edit
Edits by Treehugger71 show they are being performed by someone with a close connection.
Any statements made BY Mr Sarra that he would like forgotten have been removed from the article.
The article was left by the changes of 13-21 August as little more than an advert for Mr Sarra and his Stronger Smarter Institute. Either Mr Sarra and associates should allow the article to be encyclopaedic and NPOV, or the article should be removed as Wikipedia is NOT a place for adverts.
If Mr Sarra doesn't like the controversial statements he has made and actions he has taken that are well recorded on Wikipedia, he should not have done them in the first place.
Editing this article, correcting information edit
I have been contacted by the Stronger Smarter Institute regarding the editing of this article. Concerns were expressed regarding errors of fact. These should be corrected, however most recent edits show that there is potential for WP:COI and copyright violations from that organisation's website.
I have reverted to an earlier version of the article and attempted to incorporate the external links into the body of the article, Many recent edits have been promotional in nature and have removed or broken references.
If there are errors they should be noted on this page if the editor has concerns regarding COI, preferably with links to reliable sources. -- Paul foord (talk) 07:44, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
Would it be better to have an article on the 'Stronger Smarter Institute' edit
Concerns have been expressed regarding WP:BLP issues, would an articleon the methodology/Institute avoid these? Paul foord (talk) 04:16, 14 August 2015 (UTC)