Talk:Chris Harris (speedway rider)
 | This article was nominated for deletion on December 21, 2005. The result of the discussion was keep (nomination withdrawn). |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Image edit
Image used with permission of www.chrisharrisracing.co.uk
Problems edit
I've noticed several problems with this article, primarily a copyright issue - what exactly does "Re-produced with permission from www.chrisharrisracing.co.uk" mean? where is the permission? There is no such things a limited permission for material to be used on Wikipedia, it's all or nothing. If there are violations of copyright here, the entire article could be affected. Also, there are various phrases used in the article which contravene the Wikipedia manual of style, and are often indiciative of copyright violations. Deiz talk 11:17, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
In what form would you like the permission displayed ? Permission has been sought and granted.Hammer1980 12:56, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
- Um, I'd like the permission displayed in a way that we can all verify what licence the work has been released under. Otherwise the page contravenes WP:C. Please don't remove tone tags without copyediting the article. You may be interested to read WP:MoS and WP:PEACOCK. Deiz talk 01:54, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
- Again, instead of quoting policy, explain exactly how the permission needs displaying. Permission HAS been specifically granted to use it, word for word if necessary, on Wikipedia. Why don't you copyedit the information into a suitable format if you consider it to be a problem. I will gladly proof read it afterwards to check if the rwrite has altered the factual content information in any way.Hammer1980 10:58, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
- Permission must be granted to release all rights to the work, there is no such thing as limited permission for reproduction only on Wikipedia. This permission must be displayed on the website the material is taken from. Sorry if this wasn't clear. The good news is the text does not appear to have been copied, rather paraphrased, so unless you know different you can remove the permission notice. The image might have a copyright issue. As far as the copyediting goes, I'm sorry to hear you are not interested in creating content in line with the Wikipedia manual of style. The division of work on WP should not involve editors writing reams of noncompliant text then saying "you clean it up" to whoever points out the style guide to them. Compare it to a child spilling his dinner on the floor them telling his mum to "pick it up and I'll come back and check you've cleaned the floor to my satisfaction". Deiz talk 13:06, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
- Again, instead of quoting policy, explain exactly how the permission needs displaying. Permission HAS been specifically granted to use it, word for word if necessary, on Wikipedia. Why don't you copyedit the information into a suitable format if you consider it to be a problem. I will gladly proof read it afterwards to check if the rwrite has altered the factual content information in any way.Hammer1980 10:58, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
- Was copied and pasted, slightly amended so it made sense away from originating site. The orginal site has been amended since. However the information here is sufficient. Permission has been given for it to be used on Wikipedia and any other source for that matter, with a credit from where it was sourced from. Hence the reason I have asked three times now how to display it. With reagrds to the copyediting, if you feel it does meet wiki standards, then feel free to re-edit it instead of sticking a label on it.Hammer1980 17:03, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Chris Harris (speedway rider). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20041026183247/http://www.bbc.co.uk/devon/sport/2003/12/sport_awards_winners.shtml to http://www.bbc.co.uk/devon/sport/2003/12/sport_awards_winners.shtml
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:53, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Chris Harris (speedway rider). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060822231744/http://www.chrisharrisracing.co.uk:80/ to http://www.chrisharrisracing.co.uk
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060822231744/http://www.chrisharrisracing.co.uk:80/ to http://www.chrisharrisracing.co.uk
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:41, 23 November 2016 (UTC)