Talk:Chloë Grace Moretz/Archive 1

Archive 1

Net Worth?

According to Fortune, Chloe Moretz has the most earning potential of any child star. This is all proven, and deleting proven facts is not allowed on Wikipedia.

Childstarwars (talk) 16:10, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

It's not about proving facts here at Wikipedia, it's about providing reliable sources. If you have a reference, feel free to add that back! Cheerio, CapnZapp (talk) 09:05, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

::Lol how dickish. Is wikipedia policy really "my opinion about your source is different, so it's not reliable and you're an asshole" these days? I remember back when it was about providing accurate and relevant information to a broad audience, rather than being a police state mocked up as a forum of public interest.98.27.162.44 (talk) 07:56, 18 November 2010 (UTC)

Ignore Troll's comment. Rusted AutoParts (talk) 8:43 18 November 2010 (UTC)

Cute, I talk about what Wikipedia's mission statement is and how the community used to interpret it and I'm a troll. Yet you editing another user's post and providing no reason as to why you take issue with it is acceptable. If you're really trying to say what I said was wrong, then provide a valid argument rather than proving the point I made. Also, unregistered users are users too. Just because I'm not afraid to post my IP on the web doesn't make me less a valid user than you with your pseudo-anonymous screenname.

On-topic: removing information that's common to other articles needs to have more specific criteria on what is and isn't a reliable source than that you don't like a particular magazine.98.27.162.44 (talk) 02:28, 13 December 2010 (UTC)

Vandalism

The recent act of vandalism to this page was disturbing, particularly given that the target is a minor. I recommend this page should be locked so only logged in users can edit it. KristianSC (talk) 09:10, 19 June 2009 (CET)

There is not enough recent disruptive activity to justify semi-protection. If multiple IP users continue to vandalize this article, you can send request for page protection here.

--> Gggh ^talk/_contribs 13:08, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

The vandalism is probably happening due to Chloe Moretz being a fairly significant part of 4chan these days. I dunno if it would be worth including that fact on the page somehow? There probably won't be any sources to back up the claim. Wikiditm (talk) 13:52, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

I believe the importance of Moretz on 4chan should be included as its almost impossible to visit /b/ without realizing shes the new queen — Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.130.228.163 (talk) 23:32, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

Yes. I've added in a sentence about it as there are multiple mentions daily, and for people outside the US it might be the only thing they know about her. I couldn't find a reliable source other than things like the 4chan archive, so I've made the line as short and unprovocative as possible. Wikiditm (talk) 08:44, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

Please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. --> Gggh ^talk/_contribs 13:12, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

Is there a discussion somewhere to help out with cases like this? My guess is that there are a good few million people who only know Chloe as the "queen of /b/" so it seems weird to leave that fact out of the article, but at the same time, how could there be a reliable source for internet culture? It's not like there's any news source covering it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikiditm (talk • contribs) 16:46, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

Any actions of 4chan users regarding Moretz have to be reported by reliable sources first, not by Wikipedia editors. See WP:OR. --> Gggh ^talk/_contribs 07:30, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

Thanks :) Wikiditm (talk) 20:04, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Chloe1.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Chloe1.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Media without a source as of 27 August 2011 What should I do? Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 18:25, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

Stop Vandalism

Vandalism keeps going on, righting inappropriate things in the article, changing main image, etc. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Generalpompeyo (talk • contribs) 22:22, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

New Role

It has recently been announced that Chloe Moretz is going to star in Carrie. I think this should be mentioned it the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.30.156.66 (talk) 22:31, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

According to the news sources, negotiations are still underway. She's been offered the part of Carrie, but it doesn't seem she's accepted it quite yet, or at least nothing is official yet. We will add when it becomes official. — FoxCE (talk • contribs) 22:50, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

Move to Chloë Grace Moretz?

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved to Chloë Grace Moretz. Favonian (talk) 09:15, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

---

Chloë Moretz → Chloë Grace Moretz. Relisted. Lynch7 08:00, 1 May 2012 (UTC) – Seems like the actress is mostly credited with her middle name. QuasyBoy (talk) 17:31, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

It is how she prefers to be credited and called in real life. She wanted Chloe Grace to be a double first name (as in Mary Kate Olsen) but early on most people credited her as just Chloe Moretz because they didn't know. Now she often corrects people whenever they don't call her Chloe Grace Moretz. But because old habits die hard, most people are still getting used to calling her by her full name. For An Angel (talk) 17:59, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

So you want the name to stay as is? QuasyBoy (talk) 18:15, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

If we're voting then my vote is for the rename =] For An Angel (talk) 18:17, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

I am the the Spanish editor. In the Spanish Wikipedia the article was originally named Chloë Grace Moretz and was renamed early this year to simply Chloë Moretz. I to vote for the rename and if this occurs the Spanish version will quickly fallow. Generalpompeyo (talk) 23:44, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

• Comment. Could someone please provide a reliable reference showing she prefers to be called "Chloë Grace Moretz". Looking at gnews, it seems pretty clear the current title is the most common name, but as this is a BLP the subject's own preference does carry considerable weight. Jenks24 (talk) 16:56, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

In all her films she is referred to as Chloë Grace Moretz in the cast, always. generalpompeyo (talk) 20:52, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

I couldn't find an interview where she actually says "I prefer Chloë Grace Moretz over Chloë Moretz" but pretty much every time she introduces herself she calls herself Chloë Grace Moretz. In one interview, he introduces her as "Chloë Moretz" and she corrects him by saying "Chloë Grace Moretz" but she doesn't make a big deal out of it. For An Angel (talk) 01:01, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the replies. I think I'll go with weak support, as I think that in BLPs the subject's preference should be a big consideration, and it's not like "Chloë Grace Moretz" is never used in the media. Jenks24 (talk) 22:07, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

Support per For An Angel's documentation that she introduces herself this way, and it is also indicative that the widely-followed IMDb credits her under this name, see her page at IMDb. -- P.T. Aufrette (talk) 00:41, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

So Chloë (Grace) Moretz goes on The Late Show with David Letterman last night and he asks her, "Should I call you Chloë or Chloë Grace?" and she says, "Chloë, but my mom really likes the Grace". So now I'm just confused. For An Angel (talk) 16:22, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

Hmm, she probably said that to be nice. Moving the article under her full name, covers all the bases for now. QuasyBoy (talk) 19:14, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

Here's the YouTube clip for Letterman, I guess people can judge for themselves. I'm a bit more ambivalent than before. -- P.T. Aufrette (talk) 21:28, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

I agree with QuasyBoy, moving the article under her full name would cover all possibilities. Furthermore it would be accurate with all sources. generalpompeyo (talk) 10:10, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

Comment "Chloe Moretz" returns far more results than "Chloe Grace Moretz" on google search results. --Peaceworld 11:36, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

Support I agree with generalpompeyo and quasyboy Tiller54 (talk) 19:49, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Follow up

Spanish article moved form Chloë Moretz to Chloë Grace Moretz. generalpompeyo (talk) 14:39, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

Kick-ass 2

I saw the news via The Hollywood Reporter, but it only says her return is "expected". Nothing official.

The edit regarding this matter should be deleted. generalpompeyo (talk) 14:05, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

I agree.--> Gggh ^talk/_contribs 21:28, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

Variant name

As I mentioned it at ANI, I'll repeat the comment on the article page. Following the argument being promoted by 3 editors on biographies of living people, search in GNews shows USA Today and many other newspapers referring to her by an "alternative name" of "Chloe Grace Moretz" shouldn't both names be mentioned in the lede?

Chloë Grace Moretz also known as Chloe Grace Moretz (play /məˈrɛts/; born February 10, 1997)

In ictu oculi (talk) 06:03, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

I think that's pretty silly. The AKA is just a misspelling of her real name. It's not a nickname or a stage name (such as Calvin Cordozar Broadus, Jr. AKA Snoop Dogg) and it's not pronounced any differently than her real name. So what would be the point? For An Angel (talk) 13:52, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

For An Angel, thanks, I was just using this as a real-world real article reference point to link to for the benefit of an editor who is adding "Chloë Grace Moretz also known as Chloe Grace Moretz" type ledes to tennis biographies because letters like 'ë' may become 'e' in less careful sources. Your answer shows that it is nonsense. In ictu oculi (talk) 03:12, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

For reference only, Google search results

• "Chloë Grace Moretz" -Chloe About 637,000 results
• "Chloe Grace Moretz" -Chloë About 932,000 results

WP:DIACRITICS states that we should use the name in the majority of sources, not the most accurate sources. In ictu oculi (talk) 18:05, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

For those that are worried, this is a just another ridiculous example like above. The problem is this particular piece of nonsense isn't weird behaviour on some bios by one editor, it's been edited into a WP guideline :(. In ictu oculi (talk) 18:07, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

NB - no discussion here is required. In ictu oculi (talk) 10:15, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

Articles should be based on facts, not on internet search tools which in this case results clearly differ from reality. Identity should not depend on the miss interpretations of a vast community. generalpompeyo (talk) 14:16, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

Pointy

iio, please read WP:POINT, and cut out the nonsense. Dicklyon (talk) 19:44, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

Images

The relatively large number of images, in combination with their redundancy/gratuitousness, gives the article a really unprofessional appearance. Stay classy, people. Wikipedia is not a tribute/shrine/memorial site. Imho one image is perfectly sufficient, any more than one begs for a solid rationale. Why is more than one image necessary to afford the reader visual identification of Moretz? --87.79.99.29 (talk) 08:10, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

I agree --> Gggh ^talk/_contribs 16:51, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

Ancestry

I've removed this bit for the time being. After a long search, the only sources I can find for this data are gossip sites and/or IMDb and Wiki mirrors. The original source may be here, an explanation of the Moretz Coat of Arms, which is specific to the name but not necessarily to her immediate family. —ATinySliver/^ATalkPage 08:03, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 10 November 2015

File:Chloe-Grace-Moretz-el-ultimo-grito reference.jpg

Mzajmi (talk) 14:56, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

 Not done as you have not requested a change. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. --I am k6ka ^{Talk to me!} _{See what I have done} 15:46, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

Infobox picture

• 
  Chloë Grace Moretz

Image is not too bad, but I see its place in the article is not in Infobox. Her face is not clear in this picture, her hair hidden her eyes and also left side of her face is hidden. To wait for a better picture than that in 2013. What is the opinion of others? --Oz Steps (talk) 11:22, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Lead Seems like a lead image to me. Hairstyles cover up faces, that's what some girls do. Also, this is a 2013 image, the most recent one I could find. The 2011 image is pixellated, but has full face. So it's give and take. Also, this is a C-class article, not a featured article, and replacing the infobox image does not require discussion on the talk page per WP:BOLD or any other standards of editing Wikipedia. If someone disagrees, then a discussion can take place (as we're doing here). Anyway, I think this image should be lead, that's my !vote. – Kerαunoςcopia^◁_galaxies 17:18, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Mmkay, I was patient this time, and there are no additional comments that agree with you. Rather than pushing yourself upon me as you tend to do, I would appreciate it if you'd let the 2013 image reside in the infobox, rather than reverting me, and this discussion can still take place. There was absolutely no reason to revert me in the first place either. The 2013 image is of superior quality. The 2012 image is so oversharpened, it's almost embarrassing, and Chloë looks like her eyes were stung by bees. The hairstyle is a hairstyle and a better 2013 image that shows her face more fully can undoubtedly replace this one. I'm sorry, but no one is dissenting my image as lead except you, but you seem to dislike any new image in infoboxes as habit anyway. – Kerαunoςcopia^◁_galaxies 17:40, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

 Comment: Sorry about that, but I do not see approval until now on this image from other users, please, wait until they are approved. Thank you for that effort. --Oz Steps (talk) 02:19, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

What is wrong with you? Edits on Wikipedia don't need approval, much less yours? I have never in my entire time editing here ever run into someone like you. You literally OWN every article on your watchlist, don't you? This is so frustrating. You are the reason editors give up around here. Unfortunately for you, I don't. I'm reverting your ridiculous edit. I'm getting sick and tired of this game you play on every article I add an image to. – Kerαunoςcopia^◁_galaxies 03:23, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

I'm going to have to agree that the 2012 (and 2011) photo is better for the infobox. The purpose of the image is for identification. A reasonable quality portrait photo that shows her facial features including her eyes is better than an image with her hair upkept and covering one of her eyes. Also the non-info box images should have some pertinence to what is discussed in the article considering wikipedia is not supposed to be an image gallery. Morbidthoughts (talk) 20:46, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

It's absurd use an old image from 2011. Current image is from beginning 2013, and is pretty good. My vote to keep current image. Kazafun (talk) 19:09, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

I'm starting to think that it's a rule on this site for actresses to have bad infobox pictures. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:8:8001:ED30:9D2D:2C90:F903:94E3 (talk) 08:35, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Care to be more specific? —ATinySliver/^ATalkPage 09:10, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

So many beautiful actresses, like Chloe Moretz, Alexandra Daddario, Jennifer Lawrence, Cobie Smulders, Irina Shayk, Zooey Deschanel, and Adrianne Palicki, to name a few, whose infobox pictures don't do them justice or are just terrible. I've thought about changing them, but I thought "Nah, it'd probably be a waste of time. I know how this site is. Some idiot will probably change it back.". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:8:8001:ED30:B1CB:155B:EDC3:769 (talk) 19:12, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia, since it is an encyclopedia, is constrained by certain policies and laws, in this case copyright. I can't answer to the others on your list but, specific to Ms. Moretz, numerous free images exist; there are three from last year's Cannes appearance alone. This creates two issues:

1. The worst free image, if sufficient to identify the article's subject to the reader, must take precedence over the best fair-use image (if that's all that's available); and
2. Where multiple free images exist, the newest image that best satisfies identification purposes takes precedence.

Cannes #1 fails because the hat and oversized sunglasses cover a large portion of her face. Cannes #2 would be fine if it were the sole free image available, but her face is about 45° from the camera and she's backlit to the point of overexposure. Cannes #3, the current infobox image, is a bit oversaturated but is otherwise a very good photograph. (Edit: oversat fixed.) —ATinySliver/^ATalkPage 20:30, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Can't say I'm a big fan of that smile on her face. But I guess it isn't a big deal. Still, there are better photos of her out there. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:8:8001:ED30:318B:F0A9:EB80:3CE9 (talk) 03:51, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

No argument, you're quite right; but the issue hamstringing us all is better photos that Wikipedia can use. Cheers. —ATinySliver/^ATalkPage 04:35, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Except that when I came to this page and saw the infobox pic my initial reaction was, "Am I on the wrong page?" 67.168.176.62 (talk) 18:17, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

Would you like my optician's number? 🖖ATinySliver/^ATalkPage 22:02, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

If I Stay's review

In "Acting" section, it says "Critical response to the film was mixed; a 41% positive rating based on 65 reviews garnered by Rotten Tomatoes...". Now in RT, the film has a 36% positive rating based on 119 reviews. Can someone update this? 88.227.6.178 (talk) 15:37, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

^re@88.227.6.178: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. —Skyllfully ^(talk | _contribs) 10:50, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 16 March 2016

Please add a category about her short film called "Snackpocalypse". You can watch it here : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nShVxPiiBYA I think it should appear on her Wikipedia's page.

VirgileLeBigot (talk) 11:29, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

^re@VirgileLeBigot: Partly done: I wasn't going to create a whole new section because I'd have to apply information that you haven't given me, but I did at it to the filmography section. —Skyllfully ^(talk | _contribs) 11:02, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

It's a Funny or Die short, parodying the Divergent film trailer, so a mention in the filmography is correct. Meantime, I've cited the official video rather than IMDb because neither the video nor the official FoD site page identifies any character by name. 🖖ATinySliver/^ATalkPage 20:12, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

References

Semi-protected edit request on 15 April 2016

I am professional photographer.I want to change the profile picture of the actress Chloe Graze Moretz wikipedia page and to put a profile picture that i photographed wich is more lately and professionaly shoot. I took the photos of the actress Chloe Graze Moretz for a prestigious magazine at the photocall of the movie The 5th Wave in 2016 and i have all the pictures copyrights. And the pictures do not have any sexual or harmful content Tom Lorenzo (talk) 05:54, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

Note: @Tom Lorenzo: Please see WP:UPIMAGE for instructions on how to upload images to Wikipedia and issues with image rights. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 06:38, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

Also, Tom Lorenzo: if a proposed new image is yours and you're offering it for free use, you should upload it to Wikimedia Commons. While you do retain ownership, you'd essentially be allowing anyone else to use it or modify it however they choose. Information on Creative Commons licensing is here. Meantime, if you need further assistance after reading these links, just ask rather than continue making new edit requests. 🖖ATinySliver/^ATalkPage 08:36, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

Don't worry, ATinySliver – he's already done that. Tom Lorenzo, if these are indeed yours, then I think that it is a choice of two, either this one or this one. Allow for some other editors to discuss so that we can come to the best decision. Thanks. 4TheWynne^{(talk)(contribs)} 08:43, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

Ah; should've checked—the repeat request suggested to me that it hadn't progressed that far.

Tom Lorenzo, is there a reason these images are so low-res? The higher the quality, the better. 🖖ATinySliver/^ATalkPage 09:23, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

I wonder why there isn't any exif data. Usually, most professional cameras provide Exif data embedded with images. -- ChamithN (talk) 10:14, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

Yeah, that too. Google image search shows the images were in fact made by Tom Lorenzo but, with all respect to the uploader, for us to believe that he is Lorenzo (and therefore their owner) he'd need to provide the originals, full-size and -res, with no watermark. Otherwise they'd have to be deleted. 🖖ATinySliver/^ATalkPage 12:01, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

 Comment: There seem to be some photo stealing going on here.

• The above contributor Tom Lorenzo is impersonating a company / website that has some (licensed, not self created) photos of this actress. I blocked this account on Commons for impersonating. The stolen photos are deleted.
• The account is created in the same way like User:Alex17lol who also is involved in copyright infringement on Commons. Im not a checkuser on Commons anymore, but this guy is a WP:DUCK.

--Martin H. (talk) 22:11, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

Martin H., if we're convinced this is an impersonator—and, given his pointed unwillingness to address our concerns, I am—should not his account here be blocked, too? (As the blocking admin at Commons, the request should be yours to make, I would think.) He'd still have access to his talk page if necessary. 🖖ATinySliver/^ATalkPage 22:55, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

 Edit: I just checked WP:WHYBLOCK and impersonators are no longer directly addressed. "Persistent copyright violations" are, however; since the purpose of uploading the images to C was to use them on WP, I think this qualifies. 🖖ATinySliver/^ATalkPage 23:16, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 16 April 2016

I want a edit request to put in actress Chloe Grace Moretz filmography 2 upcoming films she is going star in 2017 MaxKool86 (talk) 21:32, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. — JJMC89 (T·C) 21:53, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

 Note: MaxKool86, you may wish to check out WP:CRYSTAL. Productions not yet filming can go in the main body of an article if reliably sourced, but the filmography includes only those actually filmed or filming. 🖖ATinySliver/^ATalkPage 04:26, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 18 April 2016

I want to put in actress Chloe Grace Moretz history that she is on of the jury of the 2016 Tribeca Film Festiva, Here are the sources:

https://tribecafilm.com/stories/juries-announced-for-2016-tribeca-film-festival http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/gallery/tribeca-film-festival-jury-photos-884501/7-chloe-grace-moretz http://www.thewrap.com/danny-glover-jessica-alba-chloe-grace-moretz-tribeca-film-festival-jury/ NickRoe (talk) 00:34, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

 Done 🖖ATinySliver/^ATalkPage 00:44, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

RfC

The following discussion is an archived record of a request for comment. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

Obvious consensus that height isn't noteworthy enough to mention in Infobox. Early close per WP:SNOW. Snuggums (talk / edits) 02:20, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

---

Do we include her height in the infobox? —ATS 🖖 Talk 18:20, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

• No – Per the template instructions, this is to be included "[i]f person was notable for their height, or if height is relevant." The cited source lacks any assertion of relevance, such as: did it play a role in getting or losing jobs? —ATS 🖖 Talk 18:20, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
• No – I mean lets be honest is anyone really going to care how tall she is ? ...., As noted by ATS if she (or anyone!) is/are actually notable for their height then fine but in this case she's not notable for her height at all. –Davey2010^Talk 19:15, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
• No – Why would we? Only if relevant per ATS or Davey.Pincrete (talk) 21:17, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
• No – I mean, what are people trying to argue? That she's short? 4TheWynne^{(talk)(contribs)} 22:30, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Nailed it. —ATS 🖖 Talk 22:41, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

• No - Her height is not in any way significant. Meatsgains (talk) 03:22, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
• No - Height is not pertinent to her career or notability.LM2000 (talk) 05:37, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Would someone like to close this? The fact that we even needed to do this is quite laughable, to be perfectly honest. 4TheWynne^{(talk)(contribs)} 01:06, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

No argument here. It's cold enough to snow. —ATS 🖖 Talk 01:23, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Born in Atlanta

Reliable source found and added. —ATS 🖖 Talk 06:49, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Chloë Grace Moretz. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.northwestgeorgianews.com/rome/lifestyles/local/actress-with-local-ties-stars-in-if-i-stay/article_bb3ea0c8-33f6-11e4-aa86-0017a43b2370.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://chloemoretz.com/biography.php
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120404162133/http://www.youngartistawards.org/noms33.html to http://www.youngartistawards.org/noms33.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927032039/http://www.saturnawards.org/nominations.html to http://www.saturnawards.org/nominations.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130225153211/http://social.entertainment.msn.com:80/movies/blogs/paralleluniverse-blogpost.aspx?post=4952c6d6-1266-4377-9ae6-ff6a00a5b59e to http://social.entertainment.msn.com/movies/blogs/paralleluniverse-blogpost.aspx?post=4952c6d6-1266-4377-9ae6-ff6a00a5b59e

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:52, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Portion of Tabloid Gossip per WP:NOTTABLOID is possibly not allowed

Attention Wikipedians. Under "Personal life", Moretz was dating Brooklyn Beckham, It has possibly confirmed that Moretz and Brooklyn Beckham have ended their relationship and I can't find a citation source. I was about to remove a portion of outdated gossip per WP:NOTTABLOID. The portion of outdated gossip is still there and was already added is still not allowed per WP:NOTTABLOID. You have two options to all Wikipedians: Option A: Add a possible citation source for a possible breakup. Option B: Remove a portion of an outdated gossip citation source about Brooklyn Beckham per WP:NOTTABLOID. Those are the two options. And the majority of Wikipedians needs a consensus. The decision has seven days to come up with a majority consensus. Thanks. 209.53.181.152 (talk) 01:31, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

By point:

1. The data that Moretz and Beckham were a couple was provided by Moretz herself during a television broadcast. The cited source is United Press International, a press agency first formed 110 years ago. What you call "outdated gossip" is neither gossip (she made the announcement) nor outdated (the announcement was made on the date given) and therefore is not governed by NOTTABLOID. Also, since the sentence is written to reflect these and only these facts (on date X she announced Y, period), it is under no time constraints whatsoever within a living encyclopedia.
2. Any data that they have since ended their relationship would, on the other hand, require a reliable source to satisfy NOTTABLOID. It, too, is under no time constraints.
3. The community will (and should) reject any arbitrary timeline imposed by you or anyone else.

—ATS 🖖 talk 02:56, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Relationships

Why on earth can't i add her relationship with Brooklyn Beckham they have been together for almost 2 years. This is not new news and have been seen together in public numerous times and have had numerous interviews about their relationship and are always flaunting their relationship on social media. Not sure why people are so adamant on changing this. THIS IS NOT rumours there are hundreds of RELIABLE sources all over the internet that show their relationship and them together. Not sure why this needs to be discussed in the bloody talk page.Stuv3 (talk) 11:51, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

Unless they get engaged or married I really don't see why it should be added even if it is picked up by reliable sources. Please review WP:NOTATABLOID. Govvy (talk) 13:04, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

Thousands of people and almost everyone are always circumstanced to their relationship status, dating life or not during their personal life on wikipedia, why is she an exception, it is important as any other celebrities relationship is important. I have reviewed WP:NOTATABLOID numerous times and it is not breaking anything to reveal this, it has been published by mainstream media from reliable sources, it is obviously public information as seen on their social media accounts, the information is factual and the information is due weight. I honestly can not see why this should not be added. Stuv3 (talk) 14:09, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

I fail to see what's encycolpedic about who they're in a relationship with ? .... If they're married then fine but they're not and adding this sort of crap just leads her personal life to fill up with who she's dated and how/when it ended ..... It's GOSSIPY amd doesn't need to be here. –Davey2010^Talk 14:59, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

Why is she the only from very few exceptions, almost every living person on wikipedia is subjected to this. Stuv3 (talk) 15:08, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia is not a tabloid. Wikipedia is not whosdatedwho.com. If you find other articles listing current relationships, there is certainly the possibility that the other article is incorrect or the situation is different in various ways. You do not know how this is handled with "almost every living person on wikipedia" as you certainly have not read more than a tiny fraction of the over 852,000 articles Wikipedia has on living people.

Multiple editors have disagreed with you. That is a consensus. - SummerPhD^v2.0 16:13, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

Inaccurate description of father's relation to the Moretz hosiery fortune.

In Early Life, the sentence "... McCoy Moretz, is a plastic surgeon, and heir to the Moretz hosiery business, bought out in 2011 for $350 million." is inaccurate. There's no source for McCoy Moretz being an heir. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fa20dit (talk • contribs) 05:31, 7 October 2018 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 20 October 2018

The "Official website" link in External links is no longer her website. Please delete it or change it. Thanks. 75.182.115.183 (talk) 13:56, 20 October 2018 (UTC) 75.182.115.183 (talk) 13:56, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

 Done Danski454 (talk) 14:29, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

EDIT REQUEST correct verb tense

In this section, please change

In 2018, she will star in the horror film Suspiria, the drama film The Miseducation of Cameron Post and the thriller film The Widow.

to

In 2018, she starred in the horror film Suspiria and the drama film The Miseducation of Cameron Post

per the linked articles' listed release dates. i don't know the release date of The Widow,

Not to be confused with Widows (2018 film).

so i don't know what verb tense that bit needs.

71.121.143.243 (talk) 06:11, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

 Done, and also fixed another error. I don't know about The Widow, either. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:15, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 20 November 2018

Please add The lead role she played in The Miseducation of Cameron Post. Brea1200 (talk) 23:11, 20 November 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Izno (talk) 19:15, 22 November 2018 (UTC)

References

Heritage should be mentioned in Early Life.

She is of British and German descent, with Scottish, Welsh and Swiss-German roots.

References

178.76.242.187 (talk) 22:03, 5 February 2019 (UTC)Velikorus

Neither of these are reliable sources. - Chris.sherlock (talk) 16:03, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

Infobox

Per WP:DISINFOBOX, I think that Moretz is one of those articles where the infobox holds little value in the context of the page. As it only has 4 parameters which are easily found elsewhere on the page, the infobox is totally necessary. Instead, her portrait should take the position of the infobox. Similar case arose at Maddie Ziegler a few years ago. ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 16:44, 10 July 2020 (UTC)