Talk:Chinese sorcery scares
Latest comment: 1 year ago by SilverStar54 in topic Excessive reliance on a single source
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 31 March 2024. The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment edit
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 30 March 2020 and 12 June 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Cbergamini.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 18:27, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
Excessive reliance on a single source edit
This is just a summary of Soulstealers, to the point where it's potentially a copyright issue. A quick google search yields no other sources on these events. If none can be found within 3 months or so, I say that this topic doesn't yet meet Wikipedia's standards of notability and should be deleted. SilverStar54 (talk) 08:56, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
- I have been thinking the same thing. The article could be saved by turning it into an article about the book. I think the content might have to be reduced though, as there may be copyright issues, as you say. Retinalsummer (talk) 14:04, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
- I'm open to that approach. The book itself seems to be notable; there are a decent number of book reviews from academic sources and at least one or two news articles that discuss it. Apparently it was "widely read in Mainland China". SilverStar54 (talk) 21:43, 23 January 2023 (UTC)