Talk:Chinese Domain Name Consortium

Untitled

collaboration between the People's Republic of China, the Republic of China (Taiwan), Hong Kong and Macau

Isn't that saying, between the PRC, the PRC, and the PRC? Sounds like another "Mainland China"-ism. Is there a way of putting this that makes clear why this isn't a redundancy? Alai 20:26, 2 November 2005 (UTC)

Most often the ministry/agency/department of the PRC has jurisdiction only over mainland China, and represents only the interest of mainland China. (There is no such thing as a government of mainland China, or ministry of mainland China.) There was a meeting last month among the health secretaries of the PRC, Hong Kong and Macao, and the meeting was called "Joint Meeting of Senior Health Officials of the Mainland, Hong Kong and Macao". — Instantnood 20:59, 2 November 2005 (UTC)

I guess something like that was the case. As I say, this could surely (and should) be expressed much more clearly. i.e., which agencies/etc are collaborating, rather than which political entities. Alai 21:17, 2 November 2005 (UTC)

Agree it's better to talk about the agencies. (Btw, would you say the Government of the UK and the Government of the UK and the Government of the UK and the Government of the UK and the Government of the UK and the Government of the UK and the Government of the UK are members of the British-Irish Council? :-D ) — Instantnood 21:32, 2 November 2005 (UTC)

Eh, no, and for reasons that should be fairly obvious. Several of its constituents are not even in the UK, much less identical with the government of the UK. Alai 23:12, 2 November 2005 (UTC)

Alright.. the Government of the UK and the Government of the UK and the Government of the UK and the Government of the UK. :-) — Instantnood 14:06, 3 November 2005 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Chinese Domain Name Consortium. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080803221702/http://www.searchideas.co.uk/blog/2008/how-do-i-register-a-cn-domain-chinese-domain to http://www.searchideas.co.uk/blog/2008/how-do-i-register-a-cn-domain-chinese-domain
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090118092138/http://www.cndomain.com.cn/ to http://www.cndomain.com.cn/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:38, 5 August 2017 (UTC)