Talk:China Post

Merge?

Maybe I'm missing something, but why isn't this part of the State Post Bureau article? SchmuckyTheCat (talk)

Agree - I think they should be together in the same article.

So far as I know, the SPB is always using China Post as its alternative name in people's life and on its business works (just like Australia Post using Auspost),while mostly using its own official name in political events and on governmental documentations.

In addition, the Philately services in PRC is authorized to the China National Philatelic Corporation (CNPC, Chinese: 中国集邮总公司), which is the primary agency of SPB (or China Post) to sale the stamps nationally issued and the relevant own-designed philatelic items to public. Different with the post offices and/or branches, it is a government-owned company in Mainland China.

Comparing SPB (China Post) and CNPC, we can find that the post services and philatelic services are normally separated in Mainland China, not like Hongkong Post, Macau Post, and Chunghwa Post (in Taiwan) which provide both two kinds of services to public. CNPC can only do business on philately, while the post offices/branches can do more than that as well as the post services to public.

--Gzyeah (talk) 04:46, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Agree — I went to State Post Bureau looking for information, and I found some of what I was looking for there and some of what I was looking for here. I support the merge so that all of this information is together in one article. Thecommexokid (talk) 21:30, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

Disagree China Post is the government owned company and SPB is the regulatory agency overseeing them. Granted, in practice, they're pretty close. RevelationDirect (talk) 09:49, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on China Post. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070904185705/http://www.post.gov.cn/ to http://www.post.gov.cn/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090106140823/http://chinapost.gov.cn/ to http://www.chinapost.gov.cn/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121114062227/http://sswz.spb.gov.cn/index/pubmessage%21linkjz.action to http://sswz.spb.gov.cn/index/pubmessage%21linkjz.action

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:10, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

Postcodes?

Does China use them? ----MountVic127 (talk) 21:06, 9 April 2024 (UTC)