Talk:China Mobile Tietong

Learn more about this page

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

China Low‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Business

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Untitled edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was moved. PeterSymonds (talk) 15:40, 9 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Page move edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I totally disagree with the page move to China Railcom. China Tietong has been the official name of the company since 2004 (see the official website, so we shouldn't use the old name. In addition, the rationale for moving ("common name used by English news media") is mistaken - a search of Google News for China Tietong gets 249 hits, compared to China Railcom with only 23 hits (all Google hits as of 2008.06.02).

According to Wikipedia:Naming conflict, the 3 objective criteria are:

Is the name in common usage in English? Both names are common, but China Tietong is more common.
Is it the official current name of the subject? China Tietong is the official current name.
Is it the name used by the subject to describe itself or themselves? The company calls itself China Tietong.

Therefore the page should be moved back to China Tietong. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ironfrost (talk • contribs) 13:37, 2 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Support the move back to China Tietong but not the rationale. The quote above from the guideline at Wikipedia:Naming conflict is misleading IMO; Reading the whole gives a rather different view. Read also the policy at Wikipedia:naming conventions and perhaps also the proposal at Wikipedia:official names. But agree that the move to China Railcom, which seems to have had no previous discussion, seems unjustified. Andrewa (talk) 15:30, 2 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Add topic