| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the China–Portugal relations article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Biased edit
Their atrocities at Ningpo and Macao, and their subsequent servility, had opened the eyes of the Celestials to their true character , and unfortunately for other European adventurers, they had come to the conclusion that all western nations were alike. - Is it just me or things like "true character" and "unfortunately" doesn't belong in a historical description and in Wikipedia? even more when the reference is a recollection of memories from the 19th c. and written by englishmen, who were therefore biased especially when regarding other europeans and their presence where they ment to be of influence. I would recommend a profound rewrite or full deletion of that section. E-roxo (talk) 19:12, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
- I've added a POV tag. Very biased indeed. Obviously who wrote it, had clear political inclinations, in order to negativelly affect relations between both countries possibly due to the Portugal-China-Lusophone Africa-Brazil partnership established sometime ago. But can we save something out of it? It needs major rewritting, it is even written as an opinion.--Pedro (talk) 00:12, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
- This article is a profoundly unbalanced and sensationalistic mess in dire need of an overhaul ASAP. The "Ming Dynasty" section should be broken down into 1513-1522 (arrival of the Portuguese until they were banned), 1522-1557 (period of exclusion until the foundation of Macau), and 1557-1644 (until the end of the Ming dynasty). A period between 1509-1513 (first contacts between Portuguese and Chinese in Malacca) should come before that. Relations between Portugal and China during the Qing dynasty were also obviously not limited to the Chinese arresting some hooligans unaffiliated with the Portuguese state. Wareno (talk) 01:20, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on China–Portugal relations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111007082822/http://shanghai.cultural-china.com/html/Latest-news-on-World-Expo/World-Expo-News/paticipation/200812/10-2428.html to http://shanghai.cultural-china.com/html/Latest-news-on-World-Expo/World-Expo-News/paticipation/200812/10-2428.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:52, 5 August 2017 (UTC)