Talk:Chiltern Radio Network

Radio: UK Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Radio-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RadioWikipedia:WikiProject RadioTemplate:WikiProject RadioRadio articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This page is within the scope of the UK Radio taskforce. New members are always welcome!

To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Create: Missing years and articles in radio, National Association of Radio Distress-Signalling and Infocommunications (Hungary)
Assess : Unassessed Radio articles; Unknown-importance Radio articles
Cleanup : Radio articles needing attention
Expand : Midweek Politics Bob Crane
Maintain : Portal:Radio
Stubs : Expand: Radio stubs
Verify : Unreferenced BLPs
Other : Collaboration of the Week:
Requests for Radio peer review:

Network News edit

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I was wondering if the The Network News section of this article should be an article in its own right. However it hasn't got any references and the only likely source of references would be audio clips so I'm reluctant to create an article for Network News at this time. Should Network News be a separate article or it is enough to keep Network News within this article? Rillington (talk)

Thanks for the message Rillington (talk). It certainly could form its own article, lack of refs are going to be the biggest hurdle. I'm struggling a bit to source decent refs for Chiltern history as a whole pre-2000s (was a listener throughout the 80s into early 90s, great station then!). Am going to keep digging ;) Bylandandsea (talk) 09:32, 27 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Add topic