Talk:Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant sarcophagus

Latest comment: 3 years ago by 2600:6C67:5080:4E46:61EA:9827:D7B1:5093 in topic Mention of Robots

Cooling slab? edit

1) What is a cooling slab? Is it just the tunnel it self? Did they build smth in the tunnel? Did they circulate air or smth in the tunnel to cool?

2) And. "When the building became overly radioactive ...". When was that?

3) "it became impossible to directly screw down the nuts and bolts or apply any direct welding to the sarcophagus". So first they built a sarcophagus, and shortly after, when they wanted to bolt this to the ground, the radiotion was too much. Or to weld the pieces of the sarcophagus together? But how did they place those pieces there? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.38.5.154 (talk) 00:42, 8 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

"radioactive lava"? edit

"radioactive lava" = Corium (nuclear reactor)? --Abdull (talk) 00:24, 20 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

500,000 construction workers?? edit

Someone recently claimed in a (real-life) discussion that 500,000 workers were employed (and contaminated) for the construction (due to the high radiation levels, each one could only work for a few seconds before having reached a maximum radiation exposure). Is that possible? I find that hard to believe. (I don't know if there was a confusion with the liquidators. Any sources confirming this? -- megA (talk) 17:50, 6 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Move to "Object Shelter" edit

The article should be moved to the title Object Shelter, which is the official name of the building. The current article, oddly enough, doesn't even mention this name, only the popular name. --NetRolller 3D 05:19, 4 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

I'd like to second this, but it was referred to as the "Shelter object" on the Chernobyl Webpage. [1] MikeofAttica (talk) 20:50, 16 December 2011 (UTC)Reply


Not sealed edit

Reading this article gives one reassurance. "Halt the release of radiation." "Lock in" radioactive material. This implies that the sarcophagus seals off everything inside it, and perhaps that is what one expects it to do. But the structure was never meant to form a seal. By design, there are many holes in the structure, and they are completely open. The sun shines in. Birds fly in and out. The holes have with a total area of about 1500 sq meters. See the video documentary "NOVA – Inside Chernobyl’s Sarcophagus" part 3, at 5:15. [2] Does the article need to be reworded to reflect this? Jedwards01 (talk) 17:22, 28 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Copied Text? edit

The article is very similar to the text found at http://chernobylgallery.com/chernobyl-disaster/sarcophagus - this is not listed as a WP mirror. 94.195.208.253 (talk) 23:21, 30 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant sarcophagus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:21, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant sarcophagus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:01, 4 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Mention of Robots edit

"When the building became overly radioactive, it became impossible to directly screw down the nuts and bolts or apply any direct welding to the sarcophagus, so this work was done by robots."

The reference provided says absolutely nothing about this claim, and I find it somewhat dubious that the Soviet Union could manufacture a robot precise enough to do such work in the span of a month, that could also withstand the amount of radiation coming off the reactor at that time.

Upon inspection, this claim has been here since the article was first created; I believe it originated via a critical mistranslation of information in its source by a non-native English speaker. The source, here, incorrectly uses the word "riveting" instead of "riveted" which I believe may be the source of some confusion.

If anyone has evidence to the contrary, that robots were in fact used to finish construction on the sarcophagus, please revise the article, or leave it in the talk so that someone else may do so.

2600:6C67:5080:4E46:61EA:9827:D7B1:5093 (talk) 23:02, 29 November 2020 (UTC)Reply