Talk:Chavda dynasty

Encyclopaedia of India, Pakistan and Bangladesh

It has been discovered that this book:

• Gupta, Om. Encyclopaedia of India, Pakistan and Bangladesh. Gyan Publishing House, 2006. ISBN 8182053897, 9788182053892.

Contains significant amounts of material plagiarized from Wikipedia articles. (Some other books from the same publisher also have this problem). There is no practical way of determining which material came from Wikipedia, and which came from other sources. Further, widespread plagiarism is an indication of poor scholarship. For those reasons, and according to Wikipedia policy, WP:CIRCULAR, I will deleting all citations to the book. However I will not delete the material that cites it, as there's no indication that the material is inaccurate. For more background, see WP:RSN#Circular references: Gyan Publishing and ISHA Books, or the archive after it goes there.   Will Beback  talk  23:12, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

Title of the Article

Google Books returns 0 results for Chapa Rajput Dynastyand 27 for Chapa (Gurjara) Dynasty. So it should be move back to the old title.Also see the Chapa (Gurjara) dynasty Journal, authored by V.A. smith.Mkrestin (talk) 21:12, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

Based on this request I have moved this back to the original title of the article. The prior move to the "Gurjara" title was also inappropriate, one reference with that name amongs hundreds with the generic name does not suffice. Please take any other moves to WP:RM for discussion. —SpacemanSpiff 05:35, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

I am carefullly observing that some one is deliberately trying to prove Chavda of Gurjar origin by deleting authentic references and adding fuzzed or duplicate refrences. this edit is not done by me but it for good.But some wiki editors are i guess paid to ruin history and defame castes. It has now become important to take them under trial and sue them..... really wiki articles are of degraded and third class quality , full of fake references and utter non sense — Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.14.175.73 (talk) 10:45, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

Origin of Chawda

There should be an independent article for Chap dynasty that ruled bhinmal during the visit of huen-tsang to indian subcontinent. It was a dynasty of historical importace for many other reason such as it is also connected to Pratihars of Ujjain and western Chaulukyas.

There is also a possibility that the Royal Gurjar Pratihars also originated from this very dynasty of chap gurjars. The famous mathematician Bramhagupta was in the court of Vyaghramukh ( the chap gurjar ruler of Gurjardesa).

I request the admin to start another article for Chap Gurjar Dynasty as it was there earlier. It'll be a great help for people who come to wikipedia insearch of some useful info. Regards The Real Rana (talk) 16:26, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Ashokharsana, Chapas of Bhinmal is different topic altogether. Some day other editors may create it. Currently it is not my focus. Meanwhile you can request at Wikipedia talk:Noticeboard for India-related topics.--Nizil (talk) 18:21, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

@Utcursch:. Thoughts on Chapas of Bhinmal?-Nizil (talk) 06:04, 8 June 2019 (UTC)

I agree with you - a different article makes sense -- unfortunately I don't have time (or resources such as reference books) to work on it either. utcursch | talk 14:11, 8 June 2019 (UTC)

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedily deleted because... (This article information same as chaulukiya dynasty and wrong information is provided ) --Kharari (talk) 04:16, 8 June 2019 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 21 May 2023

" INDIA, Post-Gupta (Gujura Confederacy). Gujuras of Sindh. Circa AD 570-712. AR Drachm (25mm, 3.84 g, 9h). Crowned Sasanian-style bust right / Fire altar with ribbons and attendants; star and crescent flanking flames. Deyell 154 (Chavadas of Gujarat); MNI 215; Göbl, Dokumente Em. 292; Sunrise 1043. VF, areas of weak strike. Good metal. " Have to add this source -https://www.cngcoins.com/Coin.aspx?CoinID=277200 Kvjr0604 (talk) 16:17, 21 May 2023 (UTC)

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Lizthegrey (talk) 16:32, 21 May 2023 (UTC)