Talk:Chasselay massacre
Latest comment: 10 months ago by Sturmvogel 66 in topic GA Review
 | Chasselay massacre was nominated as a History good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (July 21, 2023, reviewed version). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GA Review edit
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Chasselay massacre/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) 10:02, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
I'll get to this shortly.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 10:02, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
- He said, wistfully. Dabberoni15 (talk) 10:47, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
- Images appropriately licensed
- Famed strikes me as a WP:peacock word
- What makes Herold a WP:Reliable source? Or Sass?
- Spot checks made
Failed as non-responsive.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 12:23, 21 July 2023 (UTC)