Talk:Charm (programming language)

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Breawycker (talk to me!) 23:34, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

---

Charm (language) → Charm (programming language) – Other programming languages listed on Wikipedia have names which are generally followed by (programming language) rather than (language). Hannibal6912 (talk) 18:50, 28 May 2011 (UTC)

• Support. Although it goes against WP:PRECISION, it makes sense to add "programming", both for consistency with other similar articles and due to language by itself being ambiguous. Jenks24 (talk) 05:24, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
• Support per nom.--— ZjarriRrethues — ^talk 13:49, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
• Support. Nom is correct that (programming language) is the more common diambiguation phrase. Msnicki (talk) 14:39, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Notability

The citations are a bit misleading, at least as regards notability. I have a copy of Aho and Ullman, Principles of Compiler Design (the "dragon book", for its cover), and there is certainly no mention of Charm anywhere in there. I doubt there's any mention of Charm in the other Aho et al compiler text or in the ARM assembly language programming manual, either. Who knows what Stephen Wade decided in the June 1996, Acorn User Magazine article, "Charm or trinket?" But apparently even he thought that was a good question.

To establish notability, WP:GNG asks for significant coverage from reliable WP:RS independent WP:INDY sources. If better sources can't be provided, the article should be deleted. The PDF of the Acorn User article is pretty good evidence of notability. Msnicki (talk) 19:36, 28 May 2011 (UTC)

Request for notability

I am able to provide a two page scanned PDF document containing the Charm review from the June 1996 edition of Acorn User magazine if this helps establish notability, though I do not know how to make this available to Wikipedia reviewers. The magazine ceased distribution soon afterwards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hannibal6912 (talk • contribs) 13:04, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

Upload on a site like scribd.com and link itActually AU has been archived, so you can find it here(although if it hasn't been uploaded, bring a scribd copy).--— ZjarriRrethues — ^talk 13:50, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

I looked at that page myself, yesterday, hoping to find the article. Unfortunately, it looks like they only have a scan of cover for that issue. But as you say, if Hannibal6912 has a PDF, perhaps he could upload it to the 8bs.com site that's collecting Acorn User scans or to a more general site, like scribd.com, as you suggested. To answer Hannibal's question, yes, this would definitely help towards establishing notability. Whether it's enough to clear the bar depends on what's in the article. Msnicki (talk) 14:09, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

You can now find the review at:

http://www.scribd.com/fullscreen/56583477?access_key=key-zgxmagw52iqdgww9ylo

Hope that helps! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hannibal6912 (talk • contribs) 14:48, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

Sorry ... the newbie forgot the tildas on the last post Hannibal6912 (talk) 14:58, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

That helps A LOT. That's a much better article than I expected. It's over 1600 words and it is all and only about Charm. A second source would be "nice to have" but this one is good enough that I expect most editors would be pretty satisfied, especially for an article on an historical software topic. Msnicki (talk) 15:04, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

Charm++

Is there any connection with Charm++? --Trevj (talk) 21:02, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

The short answer is apart from the name - no. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hannibal6912 (talk • contribs) 16:51, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Charm (programming language). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120722192228/http://infocenter.arm.com/help/index.jsp to http://infocenter.arm.com/help/index.jsp/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:55, 20 November 2016 (UTC)