Talk:Charlotte's Web (2006 film)

Cast

• Why isn't Wilbur listed in the vioce actors yet? Don't tell me he's not going to speak!

• Presumably Wilbur's voice just hasn't been announced yet. tregoweth 06:18, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

• Wiblur's voice was heard in the TV spot that appeared during the commercials in-between the 2006 Kids' Choice Awards, but still hasn't been announced yet.

• Due to the evidence in the TV spot that Wilbur is a young piglet in this version, his voice has been revealed to be Dominic Scott Kay.

"A remake of the animated film"...

Wait a minute. On the page for this project over at http://www.walden.com, there's an interview where they state this new adaptation definitely -isn't- going to be a remake of the Hanna-Barbera version. What was the source for this "remake" statement?

(Wasn't the HB 'toon just a 'remake' of the book?)

• Removed it, since it's unsourced and probably from the same editor who said the 1973 version was "true to the original" (which it most certainly was not). Danny Lilithborne 22:06, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Release date

• December 20 is the US release date, but on IMDB it says the film will be released in Australia on December 9 (http://imdb.com/title/tt0413895/releaseinfo). Shouldn't that be the release date listed, seeing that would be the premiere? Minidictionary 12:04, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

Build A Bear Wilbur?

Mumble was a HUGE hit and is no longer available at Build A Bear. Will Wilbur follow?

Huh?

"Music by Drowning Pool was not included on the film's soundtrack CD, titled Charlotte's Web: Music from the Motion Picture."

Can someone strike this sentence? Why *would* that be included on the soundtrack? 207.111.160.28 15:34, 20 December 2006 (UTC)Ken

It's kind of an artifact from the article's history. Someone wrote that it would contain a song by Drowning Pool, but I read the list of tracks on both Charlotte's Web CDs and it's not there. I'll delete it. Karen | Talk | contribs 17:02, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks, I thought it was vandalism, but didn't want to edit it myself in case I appeared to be doing the same.  :)) 207.111.160.28 15:33, 21 December 2006 (UTC)Ken

Location

There were other places that it was fillemed like the new studios at the melbourne doclands and on the stand in the beachside suburb of williamstown.

Article Mistakes

The article points out the following, which I believe to be mistakes:

• The 2006 Fern is about seven... The character, at no point in the film, come across as being only seven years old. Dakota Fanning is thirteen years old. Is there any citation for the character being only seven in the film? I'd like to see it because if Fern is supposed to be seven then it was poorly portrayed in the film.
• Wilbur receives no marching band performance in celebration of his fame in the 2006 version. Yes, he does. As the camera pans up from the crowd to the stage were the fair governors are presenting Wilbur with his special medal, the band can be easily seen beginning their performance. Granted, the film does not show them actually marching.
• Henry Fussy is left out of the 2006 film. What? No, he isn't! He is played by Julian O'Donnell. --Bentonia School 15:17, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Another mistake I saw was that The lightning storm was left out of the 2006 version. According to the commercials and trailers I saw, there IS a thunderstorm in the movie; it occurs when Wilbur is born. --Wile E2005 19:51, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Charlotte's Web 2006.jpg

Image:Charlotte's Web 2006.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 20:18, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Please add interwiki

{{editsemiprotect}} Please add interwiki - ru:Паутина Шарлотты (фильм, 2006) --butko (talk) 08:07, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

Done Thanks. Celestra (talk) 16:13, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

Differences in the Film

Should there be a section which holds the differences between the book and film as there is for other movies made from books? Invmog (talk) 04:53, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

Thomas Haden Church's notorious adult films

What does this being a "Thomas Haden Church family film" have to do with anything? WilliamSommerwerck (talk) 17:20, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

Edit request from 74.82.68.18, 6 February 2011

{{edit semi-protected}} In the 'animal' credits: Ike's credit should be "Robert Redford", not "Robert Redford, Jr."

- The Wikipedia article on Robert Redford states that he is "Charles Robert Redford, Jr."

- He is commonly known as "Robert Redford"

Thank you, Margie mkierste@kent.edu 74.82.68.19 (talk) 17:27, 6 February 2011 (UTC)  Done The Resident Anthropologist (talk) 01:00, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

How Warner Brothers used is movie? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gakder (talk • contribs) 17:58, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 5 January 2016

Filmmaker Alejandro González Iñárritu have cited it as one of his favorite films. British actors Freddie Highmore and Taron Egerton has stated that this is one of their favorite films.

Add this to Reception!.

2.123.22.254 (talk) 21:07, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Also not sure what this adds, the reception section typically just covers critical and commercial reception Cannolis (talk) 22:04, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Charlotte's Web (2006 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061219133436/http://www.charlotteswebmovie.com:80/ to http://www.charlotteswebmovie.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:57, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Charlotte's Web (2006 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080723182320/http://bangormetro.com/media/Bangor-Metro/May-2007/E-B-Whites-Web/ to http://bangormetro.com/media/Bangor-Metro/May-2007/E-B-Whites-Web/
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.charlotteswebmovie.com/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070930160131/http://www.michaelmedved.com/pg/jsp/eot/review.jsp?pid=3649 to http://www.michaelmedved.com/pg/jsp/eot/review.jsp?pid=3649

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:33, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

Split the soundtrack article into two pages

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

I suggest that the soundtrack section of this page be split into two new pages: Charlotte's Web: Music from the Motion Picture and Charlotte's Web: Music Inspired by the Motion Picture. There's not enough room to list tracks from the soundtrack album. AdamDeanHall (talk) 12:22, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

• Oppose: firstly, if by "not enough room" you meant the article size is too big, that's not true... it's under 22k so still has some way to go before WP:SIZESPLIT becomes an issue. Secondly, the soundtrack section is unsourced... what you are proposing is creating two unsourced articles. That wouldn't fly, and would probably result in a rapid remerger into this article. Richard3120 (talk) 18:18, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.