Talk:Charles M. Williams (academic)/Archive 1
Latest comment: 8 years ago by West Virginian in topic Peer review
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
Should we subject this article to peer review? Lbertolotti (talk) 15:33, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
- Lbertolotti, thank you for the suggestion. This article is actually on my list of articles to have copyedited, and then peer reviewed, but I would not be opposed to moving it to the front of the line. Did you have any specific concerns regarding the article? -- West Virginian (talk) 15:38, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
@User:West Virginian My only suggestion is to to add a "known for" to the infobox, like in the Harold Innis article.
- Lbertolotti, Williams was known for being Harvard Business School's Edmund Cogswell Converse Professor of Finance and Banking, in which capacity he authored a number of business cases for his students. I will do a little digging to see if I can include some of his more prominent published works for the prose and for this space in the info box. Please feel free to make any edits or changes as you see fit in the meantime. I already have one current peer review that is just about finished, so I will be sure to nominate this one for PR next. Thank you for your interest in the article. -- West Virginian (talk) 16:02, 12 August 2015 (UTC)