Talk:Charles Louis de Biaudos de Casteja

Errors in syntax, titulature and emphasis

I concur in the recent edits of Aciram to reduce excessive emphasis on familial trivia in an article as brief as this one, one of several being erected on relatively minor nobles by the same editor, with familial extranea. Corrections to errors in syntax and grammatical usage also need to be allowed. FactStraight (talk) 13:43, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

Thank you. I did not wish to insist upon my opinion, but I do feel that it is completely unnecessary to have a special section for family in this article. 1) It is too short to warrant such a section; 2) although the immediate family should of course be named, this is trivia and has nothing to do with the relevance of the article, which rests upon the article subject's diplomatic career, and to have such a family section given undue relevance to the family and 3) the User who wish to have this section pointed out to me that this is a custom in Wikipedia, but while some articles of people of the nobility does have this section, he article given as an example was created by this user and of course formatted by him/he, so this is no reason, as they are a great amount of styles in the articles here. I do not wish to fight, but I felt that I should state my reasons, as I was named. --Aciram (talk) 17:09, 2 March 2018 (UTC)