Talk:Charles Lindbergh/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Comments:

1. The lead is poorly structured, consisting of one-sentence paragraphs.
2. Citations are not supposed to be in the lead unless the information is unique.
3. There are several areas of the article that contain uncited information, including a few citation needed tags.
4. Many areas of the article look sloppy with bulleted lists and one-sentence paragraphs.

By looking at the article, I feel it needs some more work, mostly with citations, before it can be considered for GA. Therefore, I will have to fail it. It may be renominated when the above issues are addressed. Dough4872 (talk) 16:52, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

None of these are isurmountable and most require minor edits to fix, how about giving me a couple days to fix them before an instant fail? --Kumioko (talk) 17:09, 31 July 2009 (UTC)