 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
Stub Assessment edit
Okay, I'm removing the stub category--again. Sheesh. This is Wikipedia's guideline for removing a stub designation:
Once a stub has been properly expanded and becomes a larger article, any editor may remove its stub template. No administrator action or formal permission is needed.
Many articles still marked as stubs have in fact been expanded beyond what is regarded as stub size. If an article is too large to be considered a stub but still needs expansion, the stub template may be removed and appropriate {{expand section}} templates may be added (no article should contain both a stub template and an expand template).
Be bold in removing stub tags that are clearly no longer applicable.
Please note this section: If an article is too large to be considered a stub but still needs expansion, the stub template may be removed and appropriate {{expand section}} templates may be added. Don't be so lazy! If it needs expansion, say where and how it's to be expanded, for heaven's sake!—Preceding unsigned comment added by Georgiasouthernlynn (talk • contribs)
- Adding the stub tag to articles is a semi-automated action taken by other editors, not a disagreement with your assessment. The reason for this was put back is because the stub class is designated by the project tag at the top of this page, not by the template in the article. I have taken the liberty of changing it to "Start" class; if a project member disagrees with my assessment feel free to change it without further discussion. Please remember WP:AGF when performing your edits. Regards! VQuakr (talk) 05:01, 19 August 2010 (UTC)